linux-kernel - [PATCH 4/4] nohz_full: Allow the boot CPU to be full nohz

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu,  4 Apr 2019 22:07:04 +1000
From:   Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>
To:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc:     Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 4/4] nohz_full: Allow the boot CPU to be full nohz

Allow the boot CPU to be full nohz, and have it take the do_timer duty
temporarily during boot.

nohz_full has been successful at significantly reducing jitter for a
large supercomputer customer, but their job control system requires
CPU0 to be for housekeeping.

This will cause suspend / kexec freeze to occur on a non-boot CPU,
so the option may need to be made conditional by arch?

Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>
---
 kernel/time/tick-common.c | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
 kernel/time/tick-sched.c  | 27 +++++++++++----------
 2 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-common.c b/kernel/time/tick-common.c
index 529143b4c8d2..31146c13226e 100644
--- a/kernel/time/tick-common.c
+++ b/kernel/time/tick-common.c
@@ -46,6 +46,14 @@ ktime_t tick_period;
  *    procedure also covers cpu hotplug.
  */
 int tick_do_timer_cpu __read_mostly = TICK_DO_TIMER_BOOT;
+#ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL
+/*
+ * tick_do_timer_boot_cpu indicates the boot CPU temporarily owns
+ * tick_do_timer_cpu and it should be taken over by an eligible secondary
+ * when one comes online.
+ */
+static int tick_do_timer_boot_cpu __read_mostly = -1;
+#endif
 
 /*
  * Debugging: see timer_list.c
@@ -167,6 +175,26 @@ void tick_setup_periodic(struct clock_event_device *dev, int broadcast)
 	}
 }
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL
+static void giveup_do_timer(void *info)
+{
+	int cpu = *(unsigned int *)info;
+
+	WARN_ON(tick_do_timer_cpu != smp_processor_id());
+
+	tick_do_timer_cpu = cpu;
+}
+
+static void tick_take_do_timer_from_boot(void)
+{
+	int cpu = smp_processor_id();
+	int from = tick_do_timer_boot_cpu;
+
+	if (from >= 0 && from != cpu)
+		smp_call_function_single(from, giveup_do_timer, &cpu, 1);
+}
+#endif
+
 /*
  * Setup the tick device
  */
@@ -186,12 +214,26 @@ static void tick_setup_device(struct tick_device *td,
 		 * this cpu:
 		 */
 		if (tick_do_timer_cpu == TICK_DO_TIMER_BOOT) {
-			if (!tick_nohz_full_cpu(cpu))
-				tick_do_timer_cpu = cpu;
-			else
-				tick_do_timer_cpu = TICK_DO_TIMER_NONE;
+			tick_do_timer_cpu = cpu;
+
 			tick_next_period = ktime_get();
 			tick_period = NSEC_PER_SEC / HZ;
+#ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL
+			/*
+			 * The boot CPU may be nohz_full, in which case set
+			 * tick_do_timer_boot_cpu so the first housekeeping
+			 * secondary that comes up will take do_timer from
+			 * us.
+			 */
+			if (tick_nohz_full_cpu(cpu))
+				tick_do_timer_boot_cpu = cpu;
+
+		} else if (tick_do_timer_boot_cpu != -1 &&
+						!tick_nohz_full_cpu(cpu)) {
+			tick_take_do_timer_from_boot();
+			tick_do_timer_boot_cpu = -1;
+			WARN_ON(tick_do_timer_cpu != cpu);
+#endif
 		}
 
 		/*
diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
index 6fa52cd6df0b..c0105bf4ecd9 100644
--- a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
+++ b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
@@ -121,10 +121,14 @@ static void tick_sched_do_timer(struct tick_sched *ts, ktime_t now)
 	 * into a long sleep. If two CPUs happen to assign themselves to
 	 * this duty, then the jiffies update is still serialized by
 	 * jiffies_lock.
+	 *
+	 * If nohz_full is enabled, this should not happen because the
+	 * tick_do_timer_cpu never relinquishes.
 	 */
-	if (unlikely(tick_do_timer_cpu == TICK_DO_TIMER_NONE)
-	    && !tick_nohz_full_cpu(cpu))
+	if (unlikely(tick_do_timer_cpu == TICK_DO_TIMER_NONE)) {
+		WARN_ON(tick_nohz_full_running);
 		tick_do_timer_cpu = cpu;
+	}
 #endif
 
 	/* Check, if the jiffies need an update */
@@ -395,8 +399,8 @@ void __init tick_nohz_full_setup(cpumask_var_t cpumask)
 static int tick_nohz_cpu_down(unsigned int cpu)
 {
 	/*
-	 * The boot CPU handles housekeeping duty (unbound timers,
-	 * workqueues, timekeeping, ...) on behalf of full dynticks
+	 * The tick_do_timer_cpu CPU handles housekeeping duty (unbound
+	 * timers, workqueues, timekeeping, ...) on behalf of full dynticks
 	 * CPUs. It must remain online when nohz full is enabled.
 	 */
 	if (tick_nohz_full_running && tick_do_timer_cpu == cpu)
@@ -423,14 +427,6 @@ void __init tick_nohz_init(void)
 		return;
 	}
 
-	cpu = smp_processor_id();
-
-	if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, tick_nohz_full_mask)) {
-		pr_warn("NO_HZ: Clearing %d from nohz_full range for timekeeping\n",
-			cpu);
-		cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, tick_nohz_full_mask);
-	}
-
 	for_each_cpu(cpu, tick_nohz_full_mask)
 		context_tracking_cpu_set(cpu);
 
@@ -904,8 +900,13 @@ static bool can_stop_idle_tick(int cpu, struct tick_sched *ts)
 		/*
 		 * Boot safety: make sure the timekeeping duty has been
 		 * assigned before entering dyntick-idle mode,
+		 * tick_do_timer_cpu is TICK_DO_TIMER_BOOT
 		 */
-		if (tick_do_timer_cpu == TICK_DO_TIMER_NONE)
+		if (unlikely(tick_do_timer_cpu == TICK_DO_TIMER_BOOT))
+			return false;
+
+		/* Should not happen for nohz-full */
+		if (WARN_ON_ONCE(tick_do_timer_cpu == TICK_DO_TIMER_NONE))
 			return false;
 	}
 
-- 
2.20.1