linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 0/9] iProc I2C slave mode and NIC mode

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 4 Apr 2019 09:28:28 -0700
From:   Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To:     Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Cc:     Ray Jui <ray.jui@...adcom.com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        Rayagonda Kokatanur <rayagonda.kokatanur@...adcom.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/9] iProc I2C slave mode and NIC mode

On 4/3/19 11:16 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 03, 2019 at 03:20:14PM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>> On 4/3/19 1:44 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>>> On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 06:18:21PM -0700, Ray Jui wrote:
>>>> This patch series adds the following support to the iProc I2C driver:
>>>> - Increase maximum read transfer size to 255 bytes
>>>> - I2C slave mode
>>>> - Polling mode
>>>> - NIC I2C mode
>>>>
>>>> This patch series is based on kernel v5.1-rc3 and available at:
>>>> https://github.com/Broadcom/arm64-linux.git
>>>> branch: i2c-slave-v6
>>>>
>>>> Changes from v5:
>>>>  - Address various comments from Wolfram
>>>
>>> In the future, please write in detail what you changed. I review so many
>>> patches that I can't recall all my comments on every patch.
>>>
>>> That being said, all patches applied to for-next, thanks!
>>
>> OK, I will drop patch #9 from my queue then, thanks.
> 
> Sorry, I meant patches 1-8 applied, assuming patch 9 was already taken.
> I usually don't pick up DTS patches, so I'd be happy if you could keep
> #9 in your tree.

Now applied and pushed out, not a problem, thanks!
-- 
Florian