[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2019 11:49:08 -0500
From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: x86@...nel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>,
Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Jon Masters <jcm@...hat.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@...onical.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 1/5] cpu/speculation: Add 'cpu_spec_mitigations='
cmdline options
On Thu, Apr 04, 2019 at 11:44:11AM -0500, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> Keeping track of the number of mitigations for all the CPU speculation
> bugs has become overwhelming for many users. It's getting more and more
> complicated to decide which mitigations are needed for a given
> architecture. Complicating matters is the fact that each arch tends to
> their own custom way to mitigate the same vulnerability.
... tends to _have_ its own custom way ...
--
Josh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists