linux-kernel - linux-next: manual merge of the at91 tree with the at91-fixes tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190405091519.48aa4098@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:   Fri, 5 Apr 2019 09:15:19 +1100
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>,
        Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
        Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@...rochip.com>
Cc:     Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Peng Hao <peng.hao2@....com.cn>,
        Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@...rochip.com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the at91 tree with the at91-fixes tree

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the at91 tree got a conflict in:

  arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c

between commit:

  ba5e60c9b75d ("arm/mach-at91/pm : fix possible object reference leak")

from the at91-fixes tree and commit:

  c3f5b8fde71f ("ARM: at91: pm: introduce at91_soc_pm structure")

from the at91 tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c
index 2a757dcaa1a5,5571658b3c46..000000000000
--- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c
@@@ -620,10 -676,8 +676,10 @@@ static int __init at91_pm_backup_init(v
  	return 0;
  
  securam_fail:
 +	put_device(&pdev->dev);
 +securam_fail_no_ref_dev:
- 	iounmap(pm_data.sfrbu);
- 	pm_data.sfrbu = NULL;
+ 	iounmap(soc_pm.data.sfrbu);
+ 	soc_pm.data.sfrbu = NULL;
  	return ret;
  }
  

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped