linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/5] mfd: ti-lmu: Remove support for LM3697

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 4 Apr 2019 09:18:09 +0100
From:   Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To:     Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>
Cc:     robh+dt@...nel.org, jacek.anaszewski@...il.com, pavel@....cz,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-leds@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] mfd: ti-lmu: Remove support for LM3697

On Thu, 04 Apr 2019, Lee Jones wrote:

> On Mon, 25 Mar 2019, Dan Murphy wrote:
> 
> > Remove support for the LM3697 from the ti-lmu
> 
> Bit of an odd place to insert a line feed.
> 
> > driver in favor of a dedicated LED driver.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/leds/Kconfig                |  2 +-
> >  drivers/mfd/Kconfig                 |  2 +-
> >  drivers/mfd/ti-lmu.c                | 17 -----------
> >  include/linux/mfd/ti-lmu-register.h | 44 -----------------------------
> >  include/linux/mfd/ti-lmu.h          |  1 -
> >  5 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-)
> 
> I'm fine with the patch.
> 
> Can you edit drivers/leds/Kconfig as part of a separate patch please?
> Keeping this in sync with this change is not critical and would add a
> whole bunch of process which we can really do without.

BTW, please add my:

For my own reference:
  Acked-for-MFD-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Linaro Services Technical Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog