[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2019 14:47:39 +0530
From: Mukesh Ojha <mojha@...eaurora.org>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
Andy Gross <andy.gross@...aro.org>
Cc: David Brown <david.brown@...aro.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] remoteproc: silence an uninitialized variable warning
On 4/4/2019 2:12 PM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> Smatch complains that "ret" might be uninitialized. I can see why it
> generates the warning, but I don't know if it's actually possible.
> Anyway initializing "ret" here is harmless.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
> ---
> drivers/soc/qcom/mdt_loader.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/mdt_loader.c b/drivers/soc/qcom/mdt_loader.c
> index 1c488024c698..fc58d660692f 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/qcom/mdt_loader.c
> +++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/mdt_loader.c
> @@ -188,7 +188,7 @@ static int __qcom_mdt_load(struct device *dev, const struct firmware *fw,
>
> if (reloc_base)
> *reloc_base = mem_reloc;
> -
> + ret = 0;
You are overriding the value here, better keep it at the start.
Thanks,
Mukesh
> out:
> kfree(fw_name);
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists