[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b58d4aa3-198d-c75f-7a3e-319ce05c7f42@web.de>
Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2019 11:18:41 +0200
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Cc: Wen Yang <wen.yang99@....com.cn>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Anirudha Sarangi <anirudh@...inx.com>,
John Linn <John.Linn@...inx.com>,
Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
Yi Wang <wang.yi59@....com.cn>
Subject: Re: [1/3] net: xilinx: fix possible object reference leak
> We don't have a copy of the patch your discussing
I find this information inappropriate because I quoted
a questionable change.
Will any contributors get interested in another update for
the implementation of the function “axienet_probe”?
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/tree/drivers/net/ethernet/xilinx/xilinx_axienet_main.c?id=fa3a419d2f674b431d38748cb58fb7da17ee8949#n1576
> and it's not even clear who you're responding to.
I wonder about this feedback.
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists