linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 1/9] soc: qcom: rpmpd: fixup rpmpd set performance state

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ac4c39f0-3ab2-7930-7d37-c132e5a7a764@free.fr>
Date:   Fri, 5 Apr 2019 16:59:10 +0200
From:   Marc Gonzalez <marc.w.gonzalez@...e.fr>
To:     Sibi Sankar <sibis@...eaurora.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
Cc:     MSM <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/9] soc: qcom: rpmpd: fixup rpmpd set performance
 state

On 27/03/2019 13:38, Sibi Sankar wrote:

> Remoteproc q6v5-mss does set_performace_state with INT_MAX on

Remoteproc q6v5-mss calls set_performance_state()

> rpmpd. This is currently ignored since it is greater than the
> max supported state. Fixup rpmpd state to max if the required
> state is greater than all the supported states.
> 
> Fixes: 075d3db8d10d ("Add support for the .set_performace_state() and
> .opp_to_performance_state()")
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sibi Sankar <sibis@...eaurora.org>

AFAIU, the Fixes tag should be on a single line, and quote the commit subject.
(And no blank line between Fixes and Signed-off-by tags.)

Fixes: 075d3db8d10d ("soc: qcom: rpmpd: Add support for get/set performance state")

> ---
>  drivers/soc/qcom/rpmpd.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmpd.c b/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmpd.c
> index 005326050c23..235d01870dd8 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmpd.c
> +++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmpd.c
> @@ -226,7 +226,7 @@ static int rpmpd_set_performance(struct generic_pm_domain *domain,
>  	struct rpmpd *pd = domain_to_rpmpd(domain);
>  
>  	if (state > MAX_RPMPD_STATE)
> -		goto out;
> +		state = MAX_RPMPD_STATE;
>  
>  	mutex_lock(&rpmpd_lock);
>  

With these two nits taken care of:

Reviewed-by: Marc Gonzalez <marc.w.gonzalez@...e.fr>

Regards.