[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190405150928.506129462@linutronix.de>
Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2019 17:06:59 +0200
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
Mitsuo Hayasaka <mitsuo.hayasaka.hu@...achi.com>
Subject: [patch V2 01/29] x86/irq/64: Limit IST stack overflow check to #DB
stack
commit 37fe6a42b343 ("x86: Check stack overflow in detail") added a broad
check for the full exception stack area, i.e. it considers the full
exception stack area as valid.
That's wrong in two aspects:
1) It does not check the individual areas one by one
2) #DF, NMI and #MCE are not enabling interrupts which means that a
regular device interrupt cannot happen in their context. In fact if a
device interrupt hits one of those IST stacks that's a bug because some
code path enabled interrupts while handling the exception.
Limit the check to the #DB stack and consider all other IST stacks as
'overflow' or invalid.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Mitsuo Hayasaka <mitsuo.hayasaka.hu@...achi.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/irq_64.c | 19 ++++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/irq_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/irq_64.c
@@ -26,9 +26,18 @@ int sysctl_panic_on_stackoverflow;
/*
* Probabilistic stack overflow check:
*
- * Only check the stack in process context, because everything else
- * runs on the big interrupt stacks. Checking reliably is too expensive,
- * so we just check from interrupts.
+ * Regular device interrupts can enter on the following stacks:
+ *
+ * - User stack
+ *
+ * - Kernel task stack
+ *
+ * - Interrupt stack if a device driver reenables interrupts
+ * which should only happen in really old drivers.
+ *
+ * - Debug IST stack
+ *
+ * All other contexts are invalid.
*/
static inline void stack_overflow_check(struct pt_regs *regs)
{
@@ -53,8 +62,8 @@ static inline void stack_overflow_check(
return;
oist = this_cpu_ptr(&orig_ist);
- estack_top = (u64)oist->ist[0] - EXCEPTION_STKSZ + STACK_TOP_MARGIN;
- estack_bottom = (u64)oist->ist[N_EXCEPTION_STACKS - 1];
+ estack_bottom = (u64)oist->ist[DEBUG_STACK];
+ estack_top = estack_bottom - DEBUG_STKSZ + STACK_TOP_MARGIN;
if (regs->sp >= estack_top && regs->sp <= estack_bottom)
return;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists