linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 02/21] arm64/iommu: improve mmap bounds checking

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3629087c-a8cb-d66e-840b-cfee125bdf4c@arm.com>
Date:   Fri, 5 Apr 2019 18:30:52 +0100
From:   Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc:     Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
        iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/21] arm64/iommu: improve mmap bounds checking

On 27/03/2019 08:04, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> The nr_pages checks should be done for all mmap requests, not just those
> using remap_pfn_range.

Hmm, the logic in iommu_dma_mmap() inherently returns an error for the 
"off >= nr_pages" case already. It's also supposed to be robust against 
the "vma_pages(vma) > nr_pages - off" condition, although by making the 
partial mapping and treating it as a success, rather than doing nothing 
and returning an error. What's the exact motivation here?

Robin.

> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
> ---
>   arch/arm64/mm/dma-mapping.c | 21 ++++++++-------------
>   1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/dma-mapping.c b/arch/arm64/mm/dma-mapping.c
> index be88beb2e377..e54288921e72 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/dma-mapping.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/dma-mapping.c
> @@ -73,19 +73,9 @@ static int __swiotlb_get_sgtable_page(struct sg_table *sgt,
>   static int __swiotlb_mmap_pfn(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>   			      unsigned long pfn, size_t size)
>   {
> -	int ret = -ENXIO;
> -	unsigned long nr_vma_pages = vma_pages(vma);
> -	unsigned long nr_pages = PAGE_ALIGN(size) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> -	unsigned long off = vma->vm_pgoff;
> -
> -	if (off < nr_pages && nr_vma_pages <= (nr_pages - off)) {
> -		ret = remap_pfn_range(vma, vma->vm_start,
> -				      pfn + off,
> -				      vma->vm_end - vma->vm_start,
> -				      vma->vm_page_prot);
> -	}
> -
> -	return ret;
> +	return remap_pfn_range(vma, vma->vm_start, pfn + vma->vm_pgoff,
> +			      vma->vm_end - vma->vm_start,
> +			      vma->vm_page_prot);
>   }
>   #endif /* CONFIG_IOMMU_DMA */
>   
> @@ -241,6 +231,8 @@ static int __iommu_mmap_attrs(struct device *dev, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>   			      void *cpu_addr, dma_addr_t dma_addr, size_t size,
>   			      unsigned long attrs)
>   {
> +	unsigned long nr_pages = PAGE_ALIGN(size) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> +	unsigned long off = vma->vm_pgoff;
>   	struct vm_struct *area;
>   	int ret;
>   
> @@ -249,6 +241,9 @@ static int __iommu_mmap_attrs(struct device *dev, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>   	if (dma_mmap_from_dev_coherent(dev, vma, cpu_addr, size, &ret))
>   		return ret;
>   
> +	if (off >= nr_pages || vma_pages(vma) > nr_pages - off)
> +		return -ENXIO;
> +
>   	if (!is_vmalloc_addr(cpu_addr)) {
>   		unsigned long pfn = page_to_pfn(virt_to_page(cpu_addr));
>   		return __swiotlb_mmap_pfn(vma, pfn, size);
>