linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH 1/2] stmmac: introduce flag to dynamically disable TX offload for rockchip devices

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1554487129.1193.0@gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 05 Apr 2019 20:58:49 +0300
From:   "Leonidas P. Papadakos" <papadakospan@...il.com>
To:     Jose Abreu <jose.abreu@...opsys.com>
Cc:     Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
        Philipp Tomsich <philipp.tomsich@...obroma-systems.com>,
        Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>,
        Christoph Müllner 
        <christoph.muellner@...obroma-systems.com>,
        Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
        Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Klaus Goger <klaus.goger@...obroma-systems.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/2] stmmac: introduce flag to dynamically disable TX
 offload for rockchip devices


> You can play around different PBL values without using the no-pbl-x8 
> option.
> 
> I would start with PBL=0x1 and then going up. If PBL=0x1 does not 
> work then
> add the no-pbl-x8 option and start with PBL=0x20 and keep decreasing.
> 
> Thanks,
> Jose Miguel Abreu
> 

Okay, so setting snps,txpbl = <0x1>; seems to work. Is that our best 
value or do higher values yield better performance?