[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <842596fe-56ee-5732-1501-85ee95364406@web.de>
Date: Sat, 6 Apr 2019 14:36:04 +0200
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: Himanshu Jha <himanshujha199640@...il.com>,
Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
Cc: cocci@...teme.lip6.fr, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
Gilles Muller <Gilles.Muller@...6.fr>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>,
Nicolas Palix <nicolas.palix@...g.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] coccinelle: api: add devm_platform_ioremap_resource
script
> +// Copyright: (C) 2019 Himanshu Jha GPLv2.
How do you think about to use a SPDX identifier?
> +// ---…
I would prefer a SmPL script without such comment lines as delimiters here.
> +position j0;
Would the variable name “p” be nicer?
> +@...ipt:python depends on report && !patch@
> +e1 << r2.e1;
> +j0 << r2.j0;
> +@@
> +
> +msg = "WARNING: Use devm_platform_ioremap_resource for %s" % (e1)
> +coccilib.report.print_report(j0[0], msg)
I suggest to print such a message without the extra variable “msg”
because the string format expression can be passed directly.
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists