linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 14/16] block: sed-opal: pass steps via argument rather than via opal

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 6 Apr 2019 11:20:45 -0400
From:   Scott Bauer <sbauer@...donthack.me>
To:     David Kozub <zub@...ux.fjfi.cvut.cz>
Cc:     Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
        Jonathan Derrick <jonathan.derrick@...el.com>,
        linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Jonas Rabenstein <jonas.rabenstein@...dium.uni-erlangen.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/16] block: sed-opal: pass steps via argument rather
 than via opal_dev

On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 01:16:06AM +0100, David Kozub wrote:
> The steps argument is only read by the next function, so it can
> be passed directly as an argument rather than via opal_dev.
> 
> Normally, the steps is an array on the stack, so the pointer stops
> being valid then the function that set opal_dev.steps returns.
> If opal_dev.steps was not set to NULL before return it would become
> a dangling pointer. When the steps are passed as argument this
> becomes easier to see and more difficult to misuse.
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Kozub <zub@...ux.fjfi.cvut.cz>
Reviewed-by: Scott Bauer <sbauer@...donthack.me>