linux-kernel - Re: Removing pcap?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190407180358.GL25552@nataraja>
Date:   Sun, 7 Apr 2019 20:03:58 +0200
From:   Harald Welte <laforge@...monks.org>
To:     Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>
Cc:     Antonio Ospite <ao2@....it>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Removing pcap?

Hi Alexandre,

On Sun, Apr 07, 2019 at 04:07:41PM +0200, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> Is it worth fixing the RTC driver or could I remove it?

I've left OpenEZX behind quite a long time ago.  Antonio was working
on it for some more time, I don't know if he's still actively using
or maintaining it.

>From my personal point of view, it's only historically relevant and
can certainly be removed from current-day mainline kernels.  That's of
course unless some other people are still actively using it, which
I somewhat doubt about a decade since those phones were last made.

Regards,
	Harlad

-- 
- Harald Welte <laforge@...monks.org>           http://laforge.gnumonks.org/
============================================================================
"Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option."
                                                  (ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)