linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/4] kernel-doc: Revert "scripts/kernel-doc: Processing -nofunc for functions only"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 8 Apr 2019 15:45:43 -0600
From:   Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To:     Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>
Cc:     linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] kernel-doc: Revert "scripts/kernel-doc: Processing
 -nofunc for functions only"

On Fri,  5 Apr 2019 14:44:50 -0700
Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com> wrote:

> Now that Docbook has been deprecated in favor of Sphinx, the -nofunction
> option in kernel-doc is defunct, e.g. Sphinx doesn't currently support
> it.  Furthermore, "functions only" behavior was used by Docproc to avoid
> duplicating exported symbols, which is now handled by -export and
> -internal.
> 
> The end goal is to enable using :nofunction: in .rst files to split
> documentation of structures into separate categories.
> 
> This reverts commit 23aebb3c05f3b3fb06a68bf6b1539a05a5f8aaab.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>

It seems strange to express this as a revert - it's far from a clean
revert of the original patch.  I think it's probably better to just merge
this series into a single patch that implements the functionality you're
after.

As for the single/plural question, let's go with singular to match
--function.

Thanks,

jon