[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190408154543.7c0ac253@lwn.net>
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2019 15:45:43 -0600
From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>
Cc: linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] kernel-doc: Revert "scripts/kernel-doc: Processing
-nofunc for functions only"
On Fri, 5 Apr 2019 14:44:50 -0700
Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com> wrote:
> Now that Docbook has been deprecated in favor of Sphinx, the -nofunction
> option in kernel-doc is defunct, e.g. Sphinx doesn't currently support
> it. Furthermore, "functions only" behavior was used by Docproc to avoid
> duplicating exported symbols, which is now handled by -export and
> -internal.
>
> The end goal is to enable using :nofunction: in .rst files to split
> documentation of structures into separate categories.
>
> This reverts commit 23aebb3c05f3b3fb06a68bf6b1539a05a5f8aaab.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>
It seems strange to express this as a revert - it's far from a clean
revert of the original patch. I think it's probably better to just merge
this series into a single patch that implements the functionality you're
after.
As for the single/plural question, let's go with singular to match
--function.
Thanks,
jon
Powered by blists - more mailing lists