lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 8 Apr 2019 15:33:34 -0700
From:   Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:     Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
        Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
        Julian Wiedmann <jwi@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Ursula Braun <ubraun@...ux.ibm.com>,
        clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com,
        Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
        linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/12] s390: ctcm: fix ctcm_new_device error return code

On Mon, Apr 08, 2019 at 11:26:19PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> clang points out that the return code from this function is
> undefined for one of the error paths:
> 
> ../drivers/s390/net/ctcm_main.c:1595:7: warning: variable 'result' is used uninitialized whenever 'if' condition is true
>       [-Wsometimes-uninitialized]
>                 if (priv->channel[direction] == NULL) {
>                     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> ../drivers/s390/net/ctcm_main.c:1638:9: note: uninitialized use occurs here
>         return result;
>                ^~~~~~
> ../drivers/s390/net/ctcm_main.c:1595:3: note: remove the 'if' if its condition is always false
>                 if (priv->channel[direction] == NULL) {
>                 ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> ../drivers/s390/net/ctcm_main.c:1539:12: note: initialize the variable 'result' to silence this warning
>         int result;
>                   ^
> 
> Make it return -ENODEV here, as in the related failure cases.
> gcc has a known bug in underreporting some of these warnings
> when it has already eliminated the assignment of the return code
> based on some earlier optimization step.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>

Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>

> ---
>  drivers/s390/net/ctcm_main.c | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/s390/net/ctcm_main.c b/drivers/s390/net/ctcm_main.c
> index 7617d21cb296..f63c5c871d3d 100644
> --- a/drivers/s390/net/ctcm_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/s390/net/ctcm_main.c
> @@ -1595,6 +1595,7 @@ static int ctcm_new_device(struct ccwgroup_device *cgdev)
>  		if (priv->channel[direction] == NULL) {
>  			if (direction == CTCM_WRITE)
>  				channel_free(priv->channel[CTCM_READ]);
> +			result = -ENODEV;
>  			goto out_dev;
>  		}
>  		priv->channel[direction]->netdev = dev;
> -- 
> 2.20.0
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ