[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190408234147.GA14359@eros.localdomain>
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2019 09:41:47 +1000
From: "Tobin C. Harding" <me@...in.cc>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Qian Cai <cai@....pw>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>, penberg@...nel.org,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>, iamjoonsoo.kim@....com,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Linux List Kernel Mailing <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] slab: fix a crash by reading /proc/slab_allocators
On Sun, Apr 07, 2019 at 07:35:34PM -1000, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 6, 2019 at 12:59 PM Qian Cai <cai@....pw> wrote:
> >
> > The commit 510ded33e075 ("slab: implement slab_root_caches list")
> > changes the name of the list node within "struct kmem_cache" from
> > "list" to "root_caches_node", but leaks_show() still use the "list"
> > which causes a crash when reading /proc/slab_allocators.
>
> The patch does seem to be correct, and I have applied it.
>
> However, it does strike me that apparently this wasn't caught for two
> years. Which makes me wonder whether we should (once again) discuss
> just removing SLAB entirely, or at least removing the
> /proc/slab_allocators file. Apparently it has never been used in the
> last two years. At some point a "this can't have worked if anybody
> ever tried to use it" situation means that the code should likely be
> excised.
The bug doesn't trigger on every read of /proc/slab_allocators (as noted
later in this thread by Qian). I tried to repro it with a bunch of
different configs and often `cat /proc/slab_allocators` just returns
empty.
I've got a patchset ready to go sitting in my tree that removes SLAB, I
could just send it to start the conversation :)
Tobin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists