linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Fixes tags need some work in the cifs tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190409095449.72007f57@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:   Tue, 9 Apr 2019 09:54:49 +1000
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Steve French <smfrench@...il.com>
Cc:     CIFS <linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        ZhangXiaoxu <zhangxiaoxu5@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Fixes tags need some work in the cifs tree

Hi Steve,

On Mon, 8 Apr 2019 17:30:20 -0500 Steve French <smfrench@...il.com> wrote:
>
> I just fixed these up manually and repushed to cifs-2.6.git for-next

Thanks.

> I was curious if checkpatch should have flagged this - I reran
> checkpatch on the original version of Zhang's patches and it didn't
> complain about the spacing (and probably should have).

Yeah, I use the attached script to check for these.  I was hoping that
someone might hack at least some of theses tests into checkpatch, but
that hasn't happened yet :-(  But, then again, I don't run checkpatch :-)
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Download attachment "check_fixes" of type "application/x-shellscript" (4198 bytes)

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped