lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 8 Apr 2019 09:21:13 +0200
From:   David Rheinsberg <david.rheinsberg@...il.com>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     John Johansen <john.johansen@...onical.com>,
        James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
        "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
        linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>
Subject: [REGRESSION] AppArmor module parameter layout changed with c5459b829b716

Hi

A recent commit changed how `/sys/module/apparmor/parameters/enabled`
looks. It was "Y"/"N" before, now it is an integer. I *think* the
commit that changed this was:

commit c5459b829b716dafd226ad270f25c9a3050f7586
Author: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Date:   Thu Sep 13 22:28:48 2018 -0700

    LSM: Plumb visibility into optional "enabled" state

I haven't recompiled with a revert, but changing the module-parameter
type looks like the obvious culprit. I don't see how this change can
be safe?

This breaks the AppArmor detection of `dbus-broker`. Can the commit be reverted?

Thanks
David

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ