[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <58b8e1bc2b064abcb67db04369cf9c6e@asem.it>
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2019 07:22:44 +0000
From: Flavio Suligoi <f.suligoi@...m.it>
To: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
CC: Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
"linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: rtc: add battery-low-hw-alarm property
HI,
> On 06/04/2019 01:07:13-0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 03, 2019 at 04:52:44PM +0200, Flavio Suligoi wrote:
> > > Some RTC devices have a battery-low automatic detection circuit.
> > > The battery-low event is usually reported with:
> > >
> > > - a bit change in a RTC status register
> > > - a hw signaling (generally using an interrupt generation), changing
> > > the hw level of a specific pin;
> > >
> > > The new property "battery-low-hw-alarm" enable the RTC to generate the
> > > hw signaling in case of battery-low event.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Flavio Suligoi <f.suligoi@...m.it>
> > > ---
> > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/rtc.txt | 3 +++
> > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/rtc.txt
> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/rtc.txt
> > > index a97fc6a..f93a44d 100644
> > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/rtc.txt
> > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/rtc.txt
> > > @@ -31,6 +31,9 @@ below.
> > > expressed in femto Farad (fF).
> > > The default value shall be listed (if
> optional),
> > > and likewise all valid values.
> > > +- battery-low-hw-alarm : Enable the "battery-low" output pin. This
> function
> > > + is available on the following devices:
> > > + - pcf2127 - pin used for alarm: INTn
> >
> > Boolean? If there's cases where which pin is selectable, then we'd need
> > this to take a value. Not sure how likely that is?
> >
>
> Indeed, there is at least the pcf85363 that has two possible pins for
> that interrupt. How would you select the pin then? a zero based index? a
> string?
I think the string could be clearer for the final user and would give
more freedom for future changes.
For example, we can call this property, instead of "battery-low-alarm" or
"low-voltage-alarm", simply: "alarm-pin_1" and then the string argument
can describe the function used; for example:
alarm-pin_1 = "backup-supply-low-voltage-alarm";
alarm-pin_2 = "......";
Flavio Suligoi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists