| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20190408071035.GF11264@shao2-debian>
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2019 15:10:35 +0800
From: kernel test robot <rong.a.chen@...el.com>
To: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Martin Liska <mliska@...e.cz>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>,
Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@...el.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
"H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, lkp@...org
Subject: [x86/retpolines] a9d57ef15c: will-it-scale.per_process_ops -2.9%
regression
Greeting,
FYI, we noticed a -2.9% regression of will-it-scale.per_process_ops due to commit:
commit: a9d57ef15cbe327fe54416dd194ee0ea66ae53a4 ("x86/retpolines: Disable switch jump tables when retpolines are enabled")
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
in testcase: will-it-scale
on test machine: 88 threads Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2699 v4 @ 2.20GHz with 64G memory
with following parameters:
nr_task: 50%
mode: process
test: poll2
cpufreq_governor: performance
test-description: Will It Scale takes a testcase and runs it from 1 through to n parallel copies to see if the testcase will scale. It builds both a process and threads based test in order to see any differences between the two.
test-url: https://github.com/antonblanchard/will-it-scale
In addition to that, the commit also has significant impact on the following tests:
+------------------+---------------------------------------------------------------+
| testcase: change | will-it-scale: will-it-scale.per_process_ops 1.9% improvement |
| test machine | 104 threads Skylake with 192G memory |
| test parameters | cpufreq_governor=performance |
| | mode=process |
| | nr_task=100% |
| | test=poll2 |
+------------------+---------------------------------------------------------------+
Details are as below:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------->
To reproduce:
git clone https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests.git
cd lkp-tests
bin/lkp install job.yaml # job file is attached in this email
bin/lkp run job.yaml
=========================================================================================
compiler/cpufreq_governor/kconfig/mode/nr_task/rootfs/tbox_group/test/testcase:
gcc-7/performance/x86_64-rhel-7.6/process/50%/debian-x86_64-2018-04-03-no-ucode.cgz/lkp-bdw-ep3d/poll2/will-it-scale
commit:
b929a500d6 ("x86/realmode: Don't leak the trampoline kernel address")
a9d57ef15c ("x86/retpolines: Disable switch jump tables when retpolines are enabled")
b929a500d6847916 a9d57ef15cbe327fe54416dd194
---------------- ---------------------------
fail:runs %reproduction fail:runs
| | |
1:4 -25% :4 dmesg.WARNING:at#for_ip_interrupt_entry/0x
%stddev %change %stddev
\ | \
330139 -2.9% 320625 will-it-scale.per_process_ops
14526142 -2.9% 14107522 will-it-scale.workload
54022 ± 5% +8.4% 58586 ± 5% meminfo.Shmem
246.31 -2.5% 240.07 turbostat.PkgWatt
264657 ± 32% -69.6% 80393 ±136% sched_debug.cpu.avg_idle.min
125898 ± 7% +27.2% 160086 ± 13% sched_debug.cpu.avg_idle.stddev
1373 ± 4% -9.3% 1245 ± 8% slabinfo.task_group.active_objs
1373 ± 4% -9.3% 1245 ± 8% slabinfo.task_group.num_objs
4457 +1.2% 4509 proc-vmstat.nr_inactive_anon
13502 ± 5% +8.4% 14640 ± 5% proc-vmstat.nr_shmem
4457 +1.2% 4509 proc-vmstat.nr_zone_inactive_anon
12930 ± 6% +11.9% 14468 ± 7% proc-vmstat.pgactivate
28524 ± 48% -46.5% 15253 ± 99% softirqs.CPU21.SCHED
16821 ± 13% +43.7% 24179 ± 20% softirqs.CPU29.RCU
10383 ± 5% -5.2% 9847 ± 4% softirqs.CPU51.RCU
4607 +237.0% 15526 ± 96% softirqs.CPU73.SCHED
9012 ± 4% +36.3% 12280 ± 24% softirqs.CPU79.RCU
9673 ± 5% -15.6% 8165 ± 11% softirqs.CPU86.RCU
18590 ± 4% -11.5% 16454 ± 5% softirqs.CPU9.RCU
68.51 ± 7% -10.9 57.58 ± 2% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.poll
64.19 ± 7% -10.1 54.05 ± 2% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe.poll
64.02 ± 7% -10.1 53.91 ± 2% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.do_syscall_64.entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe.poll
63.87 ± 7% -10.1 53.78 ± 2% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.__x64_sys_poll.do_syscall_64.entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe.poll
62.25 ± 7% -9.7 52.51 ± 2% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.do_sys_poll.__x64_sys_poll.do_syscall_64.entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe.poll
8.65 ± 7% -1.6 7.02 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.__fget_light.do_sys_poll.__x64_sys_poll.do_syscall_64.entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe
3.14 ± 7% -0.6 2.57 ± 2% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.testcase
2.36 ± 8% -0.5 1.90 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.entry_SYSCALL_64.poll
2.18 ± 7% -0.4 1.77 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.__fdget.do_sys_poll.__x64_sys_poll.do_syscall_64.entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe
2.12 ± 7% -0.4 1.72 ± 2% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp._copy_from_user.do_sys_poll.__x64_sys_poll.do_syscall_64.entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe
1.78 ± 8% -0.3 1.46 ± 3% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.syscall_return_via_sysret.poll
1.64 ± 7% -0.3 1.35 ± 2% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.copy_user_enhanced_fast_string._copy_from_user.do_sys_poll.__x64_sys_poll.do_syscall_64
0.63 ± 8% -0.3 0.34 ± 70% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.__kmalloc.do_sys_poll.__x64_sys_poll.do_syscall_64.entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe
0.53 ± 63% +0.4 0.96 ± 2% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.intel_idle.cpuidle_enter_state.do_idle.cpu_startup_entry.start_kernel
0.53 ± 63% +0.4 0.96 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.cpuidle_enter_state.do_idle.cpu_startup_entry.start_kernel.secondary_startup_64
0.53 ± 63% +0.4 0.96 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.cpu_startup_entry.start_kernel.secondary_startup_64
0.53 ± 63% +0.4 0.96 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.do_idle.cpu_startup_entry.start_kernel.secondary_startup_64
0.53 ± 63% +0.4 0.96 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.start_kernel.secondary_startup_64
27.23 ± 18% +11.2 38.42 ± 3% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.intel_idle.cpuidle_enter_state.do_idle.cpu_startup_entry.start_secondary
27.36 ± 19% +11.2 38.56 ± 3% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.cpu_startup_entry.start_secondary.secondary_startup_64
27.36 ± 19% +11.2 38.56 ± 3% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.do_idle.cpu_startup_entry.start_secondary.secondary_startup_64
27.36 ± 19% +11.2 38.56 ± 3% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.start_secondary.secondary_startup_64
27.30 ± 19% +11.2 38.50 ± 3% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.cpuidle_enter_state.do_idle.cpu_startup_entry.start_secondary.secondary_startup_64
27.97 ± 19% +11.6 39.53 ± 3% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.secondary_startup_64
0.08 ± 2% +7.5% 0.09 ± 2% perf-stat.i.MPKI
3.464e+10 -2.9% 3.365e+10 perf-stat.i.branch-instructions
0.27 +0.0 0.27 perf-stat.i.branch-miss-rate%
91626903 -1.3% 90398973 perf-stat.i.branch-misses
201334 +7.1% 215711 ± 3% perf-stat.i.cache-misses
12934851 ± 2% +4.6% 13531824 ± 2% perf-stat.i.cache-references
0.75 +2.9% 0.78 perf-stat.i.cpi
692709 ± 2% -7.2% 642795 ± 4% perf-stat.i.cycles-between-cache-misses
13369807 -4.0% 12834557 perf-stat.i.dTLB-load-misses
3.619e+10 -2.9% 3.515e+10 perf-stat.i.dTLB-loads
0.00 ± 7% +0.0 0.00 perf-stat.i.dTLB-store-miss-rate%
9252 ± 3% +13.0% 10458 ± 2% perf-stat.i.dTLB-store-misses
1.856e+10 -3.0% 1.801e+10 perf-stat.i.dTLB-stores
89.90 -0.7 89.21 perf-stat.i.iTLB-load-miss-rate%
1440658 ± 2% +8.6% 1564319 ± 2% perf-stat.i.iTLB-loads
1.636e+11 -2.9% 1.589e+11 perf-stat.i.instructions
1.33 -2.9% 1.29 perf-stat.i.ipc
0.08 ± 2% +7.7% 0.09 ± 2% perf-stat.overall.MPKI
0.26 +0.0 0.27 perf-stat.overall.branch-miss-rate%
0.75 +2.9% 0.78 perf-stat.overall.cpi
612206 -6.6% 571711 ± 3% perf-stat.overall.cycles-between-cache-misses
0.00 ± 3% +0.0 0.00 ± 2% perf-stat.overall.dTLB-store-miss-rate%
89.91 -0.7 89.22 perf-stat.overall.iTLB-load-miss-rate%
1.33 -2.9% 1.29 perf-stat.overall.ipc
3.453e+10 -2.9% 3.354e+10 perf-stat.ps.branch-instructions
91321651 -1.3% 90098532 perf-stat.ps.branch-misses
200758 +7.1% 215087 ± 3% perf-stat.ps.cache-misses
12895211 ± 2% +4.6% 13490789 ± 2% perf-stat.ps.cache-references
13324749 -4.0% 12791285 perf-stat.ps.dTLB-load-misses
3.607e+10 -2.9% 3.504e+10 perf-stat.ps.dTLB-loads
9258 ± 3% +13.1% 10473 ± 2% perf-stat.ps.dTLB-store-misses
1.85e+10 -3.0% 1.795e+10 perf-stat.ps.dTLB-stores
1435810 ± 2% +8.6% 1559044 ± 2% perf-stat.ps.iTLB-loads
1.631e+11 -2.9% 1.584e+11 perf-stat.ps.instructions
4.916e+13 -2.9% 4.772e+13 perf-stat.total.instructions
3164 ± 42% +69.6% 5368 ± 9% interrupts.CPU0.NMI:Non-maskable_interrupts
3164 ± 42% +69.6% 5368 ± 9% interrupts.CPU0.PMI:Performance_monitoring_interrupts
3089 ± 42% +72.8% 5338 ± 10% interrupts.CPU1.NMI:Non-maskable_interrupts
3089 ± 42% +72.8% 5338 ± 10% interrupts.CPU1.PMI:Performance_monitoring_interrupts
2442 ± 24% +118.0% 5325 ± 10% interrupts.CPU10.NMI:Non-maskable_interrupts
2442 ± 24% +118.0% 5325 ± 10% interrupts.CPU10.PMI:Performance_monitoring_interrupts
1193 ± 67% -67.0% 394.00 ±130% interrupts.CPU12.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
145.75 ± 67% -89.5% 15.33 ± 76% interrupts.CPU13.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
28.50 ± 98% +1725.7% 520.33 ± 65% interrupts.CPU16.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
2432 ± 24% +120.4% 5360 ± 9% interrupts.CPU17.NMI:Non-maskable_interrupts
2432 ± 24% +120.4% 5360 ± 9% interrupts.CPU17.PMI:Performance_monitoring_interrupts
2450 ± 24% +117.9% 5341 ± 10% interrupts.CPU18.NMI:Non-maskable_interrupts
2450 ± 24% +117.9% 5341 ± 10% interrupts.CPU18.PMI:Performance_monitoring_interrupts
3077 ± 42% +73.3% 5333 ± 10% interrupts.CPU19.NMI:Non-maskable_interrupts
3077 ± 42% +73.3% 5333 ± 10% interrupts.CPU19.PMI:Performance_monitoring_interrupts
3073 ± 42% +72.3% 5295 ± 11% interrupts.CPU2.NMI:Non-maskable_interrupts
3073 ± 42% +72.3% 5295 ± 11% interrupts.CPU2.PMI:Performance_monitoring_interrupts
3422 ± 27% +56.8% 5365 ± 9% interrupts.CPU20.NMI:Non-maskable_interrupts
3422 ± 27% +56.8% 5365 ± 9% interrupts.CPU20.PMI:Performance_monitoring_interrupts
238.00 ±111% +227.2% 778.67 ± 35% interrupts.CPU20.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
3433 ± 28% +56.1% 5360 ± 9% interrupts.CPU24.NMI:Non-maskable_interrupts
3433 ± 28% +56.1% 5360 ± 9% interrupts.CPU24.PMI:Performance_monitoring_interrupts
3436 ± 28% +55.3% 5336 ± 10% interrupts.CPU25.NMI:Non-maskable_interrupts
3436 ± 28% +55.3% 5336 ± 10% interrupts.CPU25.PMI:Performance_monitoring_interrupts
3428 ± 27% +55.0% 5314 ± 11% interrupts.CPU26.NMI:Non-maskable_interrupts
3428 ± 27% +55.0% 5314 ± 11% interrupts.CPU26.PMI:Performance_monitoring_interrupts
3442 ± 28% +55.2% 5344 ± 10% interrupts.CPU28.NMI:Non-maskable_interrupts
3442 ± 28% +55.2% 5344 ± 10% interrupts.CPU28.PMI:Performance_monitoring_interrupts
3428 ± 27% +88.4% 6461 ± 16% interrupts.CPU29.NMI:Non-maskable_interrupts
3428 ± 27% +88.4% 6461 ± 16% interrupts.CPU29.PMI:Performance_monitoring_interrupts
3103 ± 42% +71.6% 5325 ± 10% interrupts.CPU3.NMI:Non-maskable_interrupts
3103 ± 42% +71.6% 5325 ± 10% interrupts.CPU3.PMI:Performance_monitoring_interrupts
3445 ± 27% +54.6% 5325 ± 10% interrupts.CPU38.NMI:Non-maskable_interrupts
3445 ± 27% +54.6% 5325 ± 10% interrupts.CPU38.PMI:Performance_monitoring_interrupts
3086 ± 42% +74.5% 5387 ± 8% interrupts.CPU4.NMI:Non-maskable_interrupts
3086 ± 42% +74.5% 5387 ± 8% interrupts.CPU4.PMI:Performance_monitoring_interrupts
3078 ± 42% +109.6% 6452 ± 15% interrupts.CPU5.NMI:Non-maskable_interrupts
3078 ± 42% +109.6% 6452 ± 15% interrupts.CPU5.PMI:Performance_monitoring_interrupts
3085 ± 42% +73.7% 5361 ± 9% interrupts.CPU6.NMI:Non-maskable_interrupts
3085 ± 42% +73.7% 5361 ± 9% interrupts.CPU6.PMI:Performance_monitoring_interrupts
3064 ± 41% +75.6% 5380 ± 9% interrupts.CPU7.NMI:Non-maskable_interrupts
3064 ± 41% +75.6% 5380 ± 9% interrupts.CPU7.PMI:Performance_monitoring_interrupts
618.50 ± 95% -97.5% 15.33 ±100% interrupts.CPU7.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
3092 ± 43% +71.3% 5297 ± 11% interrupts.CPU8.NMI:Non-maskable_interrupts
3092 ± 43% +71.3% 5297 ± 11% interrupts.CPU8.PMI:Performance_monitoring_interrupts
3087 ± 42% +71.3% 5287 ± 11% interrupts.CPU9.NMI:Non-maskable_interrupts
3087 ± 42% +71.3% 5287 ± 11% interrupts.CPU9.PMI:Performance_monitoring_interrupts
485459 ± 7% +13.3% 549830 ± 8% interrupts.NMI:Non-maskable_interrupts
485459 ± 7% +13.3% 549830 ± 8% interrupts.PMI:Performance_monitoring_interrupts
will-it-scale.per_process_ops
350000 +-+----------------------------------------------------------------+
|..O.O..O.O..+.O O + O +.O..+..O.O..O.+..O.+..+..+.+..+.+..+.+..|
300000 +-+ : : : |
| : : : |
250000 +-+ : :: : |
| : : : : |
200000 +-+ : : : : |
| : : : : |
150000 +-+ : : : : |
| : : : : |
100000 +-+ : : : : |
| : : :: |
50000 +-+ : : |
| : : |
0 O-+----------O-------O----O----O---------O-------------------------+
will-it-scale.workload
1.6e+07 +-+---------------------------------------------------------------+
|..+.+..+.+..+.+ + +..+.+..+..+.+..+.+..+.+..+.+..+.+..+.+..|
1.4e+07 +-+O O O O O O : O : O O O O O |
1.2e+07 +-+ : : : |
| : :: : |
1e+07 +-+ : : : : |
| : : : : |
8e+06 +-+ : : : : |
| : : : : |
6e+06 +-+ : : : : |
4e+06 +-+ : : : : |
| :: :: |
2e+06 +-+ : : |
| : : |
0 O-+----------O------O----O----O----------O------------------------+
[*] bisect-good sample
[O] bisect-bad sample
***************************************************************************************************
lkp-skl-fpga01: 104 threads Skylake with 192G memory
=========================================================================================
compiler/cpufreq_governor/kconfig/mode/nr_task/rootfs/tbox_group/test/testcase:
gcc-7/performance/x86_64-rhel-7.6/process/100%/debian-x86_64-2018-04-03.cgz/lkp-skl-fpga01/poll2/will-it-scale
commit:
b929a500d6 ("x86/realmode: Don't leak the trampoline kernel address")
a9d57ef15c ("x86/retpolines: Disable switch jump tables when retpolines are enabled")
b929a500d6847916 a9d57ef15cbe327fe54416dd194
---------------- ---------------------------
fail:runs %reproduction fail:runs
| | |
2:4 -50% :4 dmesg.WARNING:at_ip_do_sys_poll/0x
%stddev %change %stddev
\ | \
232834 +1.9% 237246 will-it-scale.per_process_ops
24214809 +1.9% 24673704 will-it-scale.workload
6197 ± 63% -87.7% 762.25 ± 57% proc-vmstat.numa_hint_faults
22.54 ± 8% -16.8% 18.75 ± 3% sched_debug.cpu.cpu_load[2].max
29.57 +1.2% 29.91 boot-time.boot
2498 +1.9% 2547 boot-time.idle
4158 ± 4% -10.5% 3723 ± 5% slabinfo.sock_inode_cache.active_objs
4158 ± 4% -10.5% 3723 ± 5% slabinfo.sock_inode_cache.num_objs
154503 ± 5% +397.0% 767833 ±133% cpuidle.C1.time
36996508 ± 8% -56.2% 16209414 ± 80% cpuidle.C1E.time
86639 ± 6% -42.1% 50184 ± 51% cpuidle.C1E.usage
97889223 +18.1% 1.156e+08 ± 10% cpuidle.C6.time
2726 +1.5% 2767 turbostat.Avg_MHz
84477 ± 8% -43.7% 47581 ± 55% turbostat.C1E
0.12 ± 11% -0.1 0.05 ± 81% turbostat.C1E%
0.29 ± 2% +0.1 0.35 ± 10% turbostat.C6%
0.75 -43.2% 0.43 ± 9% turbostat.CPU%c1
0.16 ± 4% +34.4% 0.22 ± 12% turbostat.CPU%c6
197.15 -81.0 116.19 ± 7% turbostat.PKG_%
576.75 ± 43% -70.4% 171.00 ± 39% interrupts.CPU17.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
758.00 ± 72% -65.4% 262.50 ±108% interrupts.CPU50.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
5757 ± 2% -14.2% 4941 ± 4% interrupts.CPU51.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
174.50 ±140% -87.7% 21.50 ± 33% interrupts.CPU64.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
45.50 ± 95% +185.2% 129.75 ± 70% interrupts.CPU65.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
97.25 ±115% +460.9% 545.50 ± 65% interrupts.CPU84.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
281.50 ± 68% -86.5% 38.00 ± 44% interrupts.CPU87.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
40.00 ± 28% +138.8% 95.50 ± 41% interrupts.CPU95.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
800.00 ±102% -96.4% 29.00 ± 33% interrupts.CPU96.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
171.25 ± 3% -47.9% 89.25 ± 40% interrupts.TLB:TLB_shootdowns
18.91 -0.7 18.20 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.__fget_light.do_sys_poll.__x64_sys_poll.do_syscall_64.entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe
90.57 -0.7 89.90 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.do_syscall_64.entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe.poll
90.36 -0.7 89.69 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.__x64_sys_poll.do_syscall_64.entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe.poll
90.74 -0.7 90.08 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe.poll
95.88 -0.6 95.27 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.poll
88.47 -0.5 88.00 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.do_sys_poll.__x64_sys_poll.do_syscall_64.entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe.poll
2.74 -0.4 2.34 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.__fdget.do_sys_poll.__x64_sys_poll.do_syscall_64.entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe
0.82 ± 2% -0.1 0.77 ± 4% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.kfree.do_sys_poll.__x64_sys_poll.do_syscall_64.entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe
0.52 +0.0 0.55 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.__virt_addr_valid.__check_object_size.do_sys_poll.__x64_sys_poll.do_syscall_64
1.21 +0.1 1.27 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.__check_object_size.do_sys_poll.__x64_sys_poll.do_syscall_64.entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe
2.64 +0.1 2.71 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.entry_SYSCALL_64.poll
1.76 +0.1 1.88 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.copy_user_enhanced_fast_string._copy_from_user.do_sys_poll.__x64_sys_poll.do_syscall_64
2.52 +0.2 2.68 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp._copy_from_user.do_sys_poll.__x64_sys_poll.do_syscall_64.entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe
3.65 +0.6 4.24 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.testcase
5.765e+10 +2.0% 5.878e+10 perf-stat.i.branch-instructions
0.27 +0.0 0.28 perf-stat.i.branch-miss-rate%
1.537e+08 +6.2% 1.633e+08 perf-stat.i.branch-misses
2.83e+11 +1.5% 2.874e+11 perf-stat.i.cpu-cycles
5.912e+10 +1.9% 6.026e+10 perf-stat.i.dTLB-loads
2.858e+10 +1.9% 2.912e+10 perf-stat.i.dTLB-stores
24052836 +1.8% 24490119 perf-stat.i.iTLB-load-misses
2.723e+11 +2.0% 2.776e+11 perf-stat.i.instructions
0.27 +0.0 0.28 perf-stat.overall.branch-miss-rate%
5.746e+10 +2.0% 5.859e+10 perf-stat.ps.branch-instructions
1.532e+08 +6.2% 1.627e+08 perf-stat.ps.branch-misses
2.821e+11 +1.5% 2.864e+11 perf-stat.ps.cpu-cycles
5.892e+10 +1.9% 6.006e+10 perf-stat.ps.dTLB-loads
2.848e+10 +1.9% 2.902e+10 perf-stat.ps.dTLB-stores
23972265 +1.8% 24408198 perf-stat.ps.iTLB-load-misses
2.713e+11 +2.0% 2.767e+11 perf-stat.ps.instructions
8.175e+13 +1.9% 8.333e+13 perf-stat.total.instructions
6416 ± 3% +50.9% 9679 ± 24% softirqs.CPU103.RCU
7745 ± 5% +19.5% 9256 ± 19% softirqs.CPU12.RCU
8620 ± 4% +13.0% 9740 ± 5% softirqs.CPU25.RCU
8519 ± 2% +52.0% 12944 ± 32% softirqs.CPU33.RCU
8146 ± 2% +13.8% 9267 ± 9% softirqs.CPU35.RCU
7760 ± 2% +22.8% 9531 ± 20% softirqs.CPU39.RCU
8021 ± 4% +26.9% 10183 ± 18% softirqs.CPU40.RCU
7931 ± 3% +15.6% 9167 ± 10% softirqs.CPU42.RCU
7759 ± 2% +36.7% 10607 ± 23% softirqs.CPU44.RCU
7746 ± 3% +23.5% 9570 ± 23% softirqs.CPU45.RCU
7697 ± 2% +19.7% 9215 ± 6% softirqs.CPU47.RCU
8387 ± 2% +12.0% 9398 ± 6% softirqs.CPU58.RCU
7738 ± 3% +19.8% 9267 ± 5% softirqs.CPU60.RCU
7418 ± 3% +34.0% 9937 ± 22% softirqs.CPU72.RCU
7224 ± 2% +28.3% 9269 ± 18% softirqs.CPU82.RCU
7274 ± 2% +24.5% 9055 ± 20% softirqs.CPU88.RCU
7527 ± 3% +36.6% 10284 ± 16% softirqs.CPU89.RCU
Disclaimer:
Results have been estimated based on internal Intel analysis and are provided
for informational purposes only. Any difference in system hardware or software
design or configuration may affect actual performance.
Thanks,
Rong Chen
View attachment "config-5.1.0-rc2-00004-ga9d57ef" of type "text/plain" (193264 bytes)
View attachment "job-script" of type "text/plain" (7190 bytes)
View attachment "job.yaml" of type "text/plain" (4792 bytes)
View attachment "reproduce" of type "text/plain" (309 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists