[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190408074318.GB15689@zn.tnic>
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2019 09:43:18 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: "Ghannam, Yazen" <Yazen.Ghannam@....com>
Cc: "linux-edac@...r.kernel.org" <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"tony.luck@...el.com" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Handle MCA banks in a per_cpu way
On Sun, Apr 07, 2019 at 11:13:47PM +0000, Ghannam, Yazen wrote:
> Yazen Ghannam (5):
> x86/MCE: Make struct mce_banks[] static
> x86/MCE: Handle MCA controls in a per_cpu way
> x86/MCE/AMD: Don't cache block addresses on SMCA systems
> x86/MCE: Make number of MCA banks per_cpu
> x86/MCE: Save MCA control bits that get set in hardware
>
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/amd.c | 87 +++++++++---------
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/core.c | 138 +++++++++++++++++++----------
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/inject.c | 7 +-
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/internal.h | 12 +--
> 4 files changed, 137 insertions(+), 107 deletions(-)
This patchset doesn't apply cleanly. Please redo it against current
tip/master.
Thx.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists