[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190408091458.00004e48@huawei.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2019 09:14:58 +0100
From: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@...wei.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
CC: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the
staging.current tree
On Mon, 8 Apr 2019 13:02:12 +1000
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the staging tree got a conflict in:
>
> drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c
>
> between commit:
>
> 20ea39ef9f2f ("iio: Fix scan mask selection")
>
> from the staging.current tree and commit:
>
> 3862828a903d ("iio: buffer: Switch to bitmap_zalloc()")
>
> from the staging tree.
>
> I fixed it up (I just used the staging tree version) and can carry the
> fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned,
> but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream
> maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging. You may also want
> to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to
> minimise any particularly complex conflicts.
>
Thanks Stephen,
That is the correct resolution.
Jonathan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists