[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190408150654.GV12232@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2019 17:06:54 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: kan.liang@...ux.intel.com
Cc: acme@...nel.org, mingo@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, jolsa@...nel.org, eranian@...gle.com,
alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com, ak@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 08/12] perf/x86/intel: Add Icelake support
On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 12:45:05PM -0700, kan.liang@...ux.intel.com wrote:
> +static struct event_constraint *
> +icl_get_event_constraints(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc, int idx,
> + struct perf_event *event)
> +{
> + /*
> + * Fixed counter 0 has less skid.
> + * Force instruction:ppp in Fixed counter 0
> + */
> + if ((event->attr.precise_ip == 3) &&
> + ((event->hw.config & X86_RAW_EVENT_MASK) == 0x00c0))
> + return &fixed_counter0_constraint;
Does that want to be:
event->hw.config == X86_CONFIG(.event=0xc0)
?
That is, are there really bits we want to mask in there?
> +
> + return hsw_get_event_constraints(cpuc, idx, event);
> +}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists