[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ef1481e8-c664-5f17-4a19-bb90daabc0b7@kernel.dk>
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2019 09:17:58 -0600
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To: Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@...aro.org>,
Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@...e.de>
Cc: linux-block <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
'Paolo Valente' via bfq-iosched
<bfq-iosched@...glegroups.com>,
Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@...alenko.name>,
Angelo Ruocco <angeloruocco90@...il.com>,
lennart@...ttering.net, mkoutny@...e.cz
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] block, bfq: delete "bfq" prefix from cgroup filenames
On 4/8/19 9:14 AM, Paolo Valente wrote:
>
>
>> Il giorno 8 apr 2019, alle ore 17:08, Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@...e.de> ha scritto:
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 08, 2019 at 09:05:19AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>> I did consider that, and that would be doable. But honestly, I'm having a
>>> hard time seeing what issue we are attempting to fix by doing this.
>>
>> Yeah, I guess the real fix would be to update the documentation and the
>> expectations user-space has. Including eventual re-write of some udev rules or
>> whatever is facing these files. But to me that sounds more like a systemd or
>> even distro thing than a kernel thing.
>>
>
> Unfortunately the user-space people I have interacted with find crazy
> to have to change their software to call bfq.weight the weight of a
> group. And are not willing to do it [1].
Then you need to educate them. Some of the issues were called out years
ago, at the time when we could have potentially renamed. A rename now
will solve nothing.
--
Jens Axboe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists