[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <336e5dd6-038e-fad4-0038-bd2d19f0dd4a@web.de>
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2019 18:38:46 +0200
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: Wen Yang <wen.yang99@....com.cn>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham+renesas@...asonboard.com>,
Mukesh Ojha <mojha@...eaurora.org>,
Yi Wang <wang.yi59@....com.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drm: rcar-du: fix possible object reference leak
> v2->v1: turn the return into a goto done.
* The version identification can be shorter, can't it?
* The expection handling should be completed for the implementation
of the function “rcar_du_of_lvds_patch” in a different way.
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/tree/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_of.c?id=ac5b84a1ffe93c9fb882c0f2bdfac1c33077b920#n195
How do you think about to add a few jump targets (at the end)?
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists