linux-kernel - [PATCH 07/13] softirq: Avoid "local_softirq_pending" messages if task is in cpu

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <adb5c111156a6945e65ed2ebe214625034923ceb.1554737688.git.tom.zanussi@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Mon,  8 Apr 2019 14:14:09 -0500
From:   Tom Zanussi <zanussi@...nel.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     rostedt@...dmis.org, tglx@...utronix.de, C.Emde@...dl.org,
        jkacur@...hat.com, bigeasy@...utronix.de,
        daniel.wagner@...mens.com, julia@...com, amartin@...dia.com
Subject: [PATCH 07/13] softirq: Avoid "local_softirq_pending" messages if task is in cpu_chill()

4.14.109-rt58-rc1 stable review patch.
If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>

[ Upstream commit a3429e0147dfd3fc585f989aa49a76579c2b6565 ]

If the softirq thread enters cpu_chill() then ->state is UNINTERRUPTIBLE
and has no ->pi_blocked_on set and so its mask is not taken into account.

->sleeping_lock is increased by cpu_chill() since it is also requried to
avoid a splat by RCU in case cpu_chill() is used while a RCU-read lock
is held. Use the same mechanism for the softirq-pending check.

Cc: stable-rt@...r.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@...ux.intel.com>
---
 kernel/softirq.c | 5 ++++-
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/softirq.c b/kernel/softirq.c
index be752eadfc68..e42ee95fccda 100644
--- a/kernel/softirq.c
+++ b/kernel/softirq.c
@@ -105,9 +105,12 @@ static bool softirq_check_runner_tsk(struct task_struct *tsk,
 	 * _before_ it sets pi_blocked_on to NULL under
 	 * tsk->pi_lock. So we need to check for both: state
 	 * and pi_blocked_on.
+	 * The test against UNINTERRUPTIBLE + ->sleeping_lock is in case the
+	 * task does cpu_chill().
 	 */
 	raw_spin_lock(&tsk->pi_lock);
-	if (tsk->pi_blocked_on || tsk->state == TASK_RUNNING) {
+	if (tsk->pi_blocked_on || tsk->state == TASK_RUNNING ||
+	    (tsk->state == TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE && tsk->sleeping_lock)) {
 		/* Clear all bits pending in that task */
 		*pending &= ~(tsk->softirqs_raised);
 		ret = true;
-- 
2.14.1