[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPpJ_edx2J6RyH2MuysXhE4hM61mWn+Th83HNeQtsFLF1K_mzA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2019 14:02:14 +0800
From: Jian-Hong Pan <jian-hong@...lessm.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
x86@...nel.org, Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Upstreaming Team <linux@...lessm.com>,
Daniel Drake <drake@...lessm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/reboot: Use efi reboot for Acer TravelMate X514-51T
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> 於 2019年4月6日 週六 上午5:14寫道:
>
> On Mon, 1 Apr 2019, Jian-Hong Pan wrote:
> > +/*
> > + * Some machines require the "reboot=e" commandline options
> > + */
> > +static int __init set_efi_reboot(const struct dmi_system_id *d)
> > +{
> > + if (reboot_type != BOOT_EFI) {
> > + reboot_type = BOOT_EFI;
>
> So if EFI is disabled in the kernel this will fall through to BOOT_BIOS. Is
> that intended behaviour?
If not choose EFI as the reboot type, system will use APCI reboot type
on Acer TravelMate X514-51T.
If the reboot type is set as BIOS by appending "reboot=b", system
cannot reboot and hangs up when shutdown.
> > + pr_info("%s series board detected. Selecting %s-method for reboot.\n",
> > + d->ident, "EFI");
>
> Is thee a reason not to write "EFI" in the string itself?
Just simply follow the format like functions: set_acpi_reboot, set_bios_reboot
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.1-rc4/source/arch/x86/kernel/reboot.c#L60
BR,
Jian-Hong Pan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists