[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1554781699-42604-1-git-send-email-hofrat@opentech.at>
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2019 05:48:18 +0200
From: Nicholas Mc Guire <hofrat@...ntech.at>
To: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Daniel Mack <daniel@...que.org>, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Nicholas Mc Guire <hofrat@...ntech.at>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] NFC: st95hf: use msleep for long delay
usleep_ranges is backed by hrtimers - for a delay of 50ms
notably in a loop using a hrtimer is of no benefit and
msleep() should be fine here (see
Documentation/timers/timers-howto.txt).
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Mc Guire <hofrat@...ntech.at>
---
Problem located with an experimental coccinelle script
Patch was compile tested with: x86_64_defconfig + SPI=y,
NFC=y, NFC_DIGITAL=y, NFC_ST95HF=m
Patch is against 5.1-rc3 (localversion-next is -next-20190408)
drivers/nfc/st95hf/core.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/nfc/st95hf/core.c b/drivers/nfc/st95hf/core.c
index a50a95c..34bf1d7 100644
--- a/drivers/nfc/st95hf/core.c
+++ b/drivers/nfc/st95hf/core.c
@@ -535,7 +535,7 @@ static int st95hf_por_sequence(struct st95hf_context *st95context)
st95hf_send_spi_reset_sequence(st95context);
/* delay of 50 milisecond */
- usleep_range(50000, 51000);
+ msleep(50);
} while (nth_attempt++ < 3);
return -ETIMEDOUT;
--
2.1.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists