linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 00/28] userfaultfd: write protection support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190409060839.GE3389@xz-x1>
Date:   Tue, 9 Apr 2019 14:08:39 +0800
From:   Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>
To:     linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
        Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
        Maya Gokhale <gokhale2@...l.gov>,
        Jerome Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>,
        Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...tuozzo.com>,
        Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
        Martin Cracauer <cracauer@...s.org>, Shaohua Li <shli@...com>,
        Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
        Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
        Denis Plotnikov <dplotnikov@...tuozzo.com>,
        Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Marty McFadden <mcfadden8@...l.gov>,
        Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
        "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>,
        "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/28] userfaultfd: write protection support

On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 10:06:14AM +0800, Peter Xu wrote:
> This series implements initial write protection support for
> userfaultfd.  Currently both shmem and hugetlbfs are not supported
> yet, but only anonymous memory.  This is the 3nd version of it.
> 
> The latest code can also be found at:
> 
>   https://github.com/xzpeter/linux/tree/uffd-wp-merged
> 
> Note again that the first 5 patches in the series can be seen as
> isolated work on page fault mechanism.  I would hope that they can be
> considered to be reviewed/picked even earlier than the rest of the
> series since it's even useful for existing userfaultfd MISSING case
> [8].

Ping - any further comments for v3?  Is there any chance to have this
series (or the first 5 patches) for 5.2?

Thanks,

-- 
Peter Xu