lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 8 Apr 2019 17:10:49 -0700
From:   Kees Cook <keescook@...gle.com>
To:     "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
Cc:     David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>, linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] afs: Mark expected switch fall-throughs

On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 2:02 PM Gustavo A. R. Silva
<gustavo@...eddedor.com> wrote:
> In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
> where we are expecting to fall through.
>
> Notice that in many cases I placed a /* Fall through */ comment
> at the bottom of the case, which what GCC is expecting to find.
>
> In other cases I had to tweak a bit the format of the comments.
>
> This patch suppresses ALL missing-break-in-switch false positives
> in fs/afs
>
> Addresses-Coverity-ID: 115042 ("Missing break in switch")
> Addresses-Coverity-ID: 115043 ("Missing break in switch")
> Addresses-Coverity-ID: 115045 ("Missing break in switch")
> Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1357430 ("Missing break in switch")
> Addresses-Coverity-ID: 115047 ("Missing break in switch")
> Addresses-Coverity-ID: 115050 ("Missing break in switch")
> Addresses-Coverity-ID: 115051 ("Missing break in switch")
> Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1467806 ("Missing break in switch")
> Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1467807 ("Missing break in switch")
> Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1467811 ("Missing break in switch")
> Addresses-Coverity-ID: 115041 ("Missing break in switch")
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@...eddedor.com>

These look good to me. Gets us another step to finishing this. :)

Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>

-- 
Kees Cook

Powered by blists - more mailing lists