[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190409020432.GA7102@ranerica-svr.sc.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2019 19:04:32 -0700
From: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@...ux.intel.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@...el.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi.kleen@...el.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"Ravi V. Shankar" <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri@...el.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Clemens Ladisch <clemens@...isch.de>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@...b.com>,
Kate Stewart <kstewart@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 05/14] x86/hpet: Relocate flag definitions to a
header file
On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 10:11:16PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Feb 2019, Ricardo Neri wrote:
>
> > Users of HPET timers (such as the hardlockup detector) need the definitions
> > of these flags to interpret the configuration of a timer as passed by
> > platform code.
>
> Which platform code?
Sorry, it is not platform code. Shall I call it the HPET-enabling code?
>
> > +#define HPET_DEV_USED_BIT 2
> > +#define HPET_DEV_USED (1 << HPET_DEV_USED_BIT)
> > +#define HPET_DEV_VALID 0x8
> > +#define HPET_DEV_FSB_CAP 0x1000
> > +#define HPET_DEV_PERI_CAP 0x2000
>
> I'm not seing why you would need any of those in the watchdog code.
>
> The only function related to the watchdog which needs these is
> hpet_hardlockup_detector_assign_timer() and that is located in hpet.c
> itself.
Yes, I see now that it is not needed. This patch can be removed.
Thanks and BR,
Ricardo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists