[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190409134141.GB9759@linux.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2019 16:41:41 +0300
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
To: Martin Kepplinger <martin.kepplinger@...zinger.com>
Cc: Paul Zimmerman <pauldzim@...il.com>,
Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@....de>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Regression in suspend-to-ram (TPM related) with 5.1-rc1
(BISECTED)
On Mon, Apr 08, 2019 at 07:53:34AM +0200, Martin Kepplinger wrote:
> On 21.03.19 14:41, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 04:03:37PM -0700, Paul Zimmerman wrote:
> >> So I bisected this down to:
> >>
> >> # first bad commit: [a3fbfae82b4cb3ff9928e29f34c64d0507cad874] tpm:
> >> take TPM chip power gating out of tpm_transmit()
> >>
> >> but this doesn't revert cleanly on Linus' HEAD. Anyone have an idea what
> >> could be wrong here?
> >
> > Sorry I've been in flu for the early week. I spotted the bug
> > immediately. When I did these patches I did not have TPM 1.x at my
> > hand. I used fTPM 2.0 and dTPM 2.0. Stefan did TPM 1.x testing but I
> > probably forgot to ask him to try out suspend.
> >
> > Anyway, the bug is obvious and I'll send you a patch to try out.
> > Thanks a lot for bisecting this!
> >
> > /Jarkko
> >
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Any news on this? It seems not to be fixed in -rc4. I'd happily test a
> patch too.
>
> thanks a lot,
>
> martin
I sent a PR to James last week with the fix. Probably has not landed
yet.
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-integrity/20190329115544.GA27351@linux.intel.com/
/Jarkko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists