linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v10 4/7] dt-bindings: anybus-controller: document devicetree binding

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAGngYiX+53Rk2gTJ7G0QhQvEL-fF=Zan5jW9h7cR3gV1-J9xCg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 9 Apr 2019 13:31:53 -0400
From:   Sven Van Asbroeck <thesven73@...il.com>
To:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 4/7] dt-bindings: anybus-controller: document
 devicetree binding

On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 1:16 PM Sven Van Asbroeck <thesven73@...il.com> wrote:
>
> My apologies for the confusion. You already offered your tag to an
> identical commit in v3:
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/11/6/66
>
> Am I ok to add it, given that nothing has changed in this particular commit?

I added a link to the wrong version. The current patch is identical to
v5, where you
said it looks fine, but the series itself still has discussion.
https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/12/7/600

Should I re-post to the DT list?