[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1904101452340.100430@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 14:53:34 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
cc: "Tobin C. Harding" <tobin@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Qian Cai <cai@....pw>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] mm: Remove the SLAB allocator
On Wed, 10 Apr 2019, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> On 4/10/19 4:47 AM, Tobin C. Harding wrote:
> > Recently a 2 year old bug was found in the SLAB allocator that crashes
> > the kernel. This seems to imply that not that many people are using the
> > SLAB allocator.
>
> AFAIK that bug required CONFIG_DEBUG_SLAB_LEAK, not just SLAB. That
> seems to imply not that many people are using SLAB when debugging and
> yeah, SLUB has better debugging support. But I wouldn't dare to make the
> broader implication :)
>
> > Currently we have 3 slab allocators. Two is company three is a crowd -
> > let's get rid of one.
> >
> > - The SLUB allocator has been the default since 2.6.23
>
> Yeah, with a sophisticated reasoning :)
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=a0acd820807680d2ccc4ef3448387fcdbf152c73
>
> > - The SLOB allocator is kinda sexy. Its only 664 LOC, the general
> > design is outlined in KnR, and there is an optimisation taken from
> > Knuth - say no more.
> >
> > If you are using the SLAB allocator please speak now or forever hold your peace ...
>
> FWIW, our enterprise kernel use it (latest is 4.12 based), and openSUSE
> kernels as well (with openSUSE Tumbleweed that includes latest
> kernel.org stables). AFAIK we don't enable SLAB_DEBUG even in general
> debug kernel flavours as it's just too slow.
>
> IIRC last time Mel evaluated switching to SLUB, it wasn't a clear
> winner, but I'll just CC him for details :)
>
We also use CONFIG_SLAB and disable CONFIG_SLAB_DEBUG for the same reason.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists