[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGXu5jLPxUESH9eMm6rvaTVue_9rNEdx+9dcxiV11kgi03jUmA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 15:04:24 -0700
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Sinan Kaya <Okaya@...nel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
Adrian Reber <adrian@...as.de>,
Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] init: Do not select DEBUG_KERNEL by default
On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 2:54 PM Sinan Kaya <Okaya@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On 4/10/2019 5:45 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 2:26 PM Sinan Kaya <okaya@...nel.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> We can't seem to have a kernel with CONFIG_EXPERT set but
> >> CONFIG_DEBUG_KERNEL unset these days.
> >>
> >> While some of the features under the CONFIG_EXPERT require
> >> CONFIG_DEBUG_KERNEL, it doesn't apply for all features.
> >>
> >> The meaning of CONFIG_EXPERT and CONFIG_DEBUG_KERNEL has been
> >> mixed here.
> >
> > I don't agree: the point of EXPERT is to show _everything_, which
> > means DEBUG_KERNEL should be selected to show those options as well. I
> > think this is fine as-is. What is the problem you want to solve?
> >
> > I think of it as low (nothing selected) medium (DEBUG_KERNEL) and high
> > (EXPERT and DEBUG_KERNEL). So EXPERT enables DEBUG_KERNEL too.
> >
>
> Sure, let's see if there is a better option.
>
> I don't want any of the debug features in my kernel but still
> need all the expert features. My kernel is considered a production
> kernel. I don't really want to ship all the good debug enables.
Production kernels enable it. e.g. Ubuntu:
$ grep '\bCONFIG_DEBUG_KERNEL\b' /boot/config-$(uname -r)
CONFIG_DEBUG_KERNEL=y
> On the other hand, I need the features under CONFIG_EXPERT to have
> a functional system.
>
> Let's take "multiple users" as an example.
>
> What's the point of having a kernel without multiple users? :)
>
> I don't see the relationship between CONFIG_DEBUG and CONFIG_EXPERT
> as none of the features except KALLSYMS depend on it. If there was
> a compile time dependency, I'd say move it to the things that need
> it as this patch suggests.
CONFIG_DEBUG_KERNEL mainly only enables the visibility of various
other options. I can only find two instances of it controlling a
"default", and one is overridden by CONFIG_SMP on alpha. :)
$ git grep -B2 'default.*DEBUG_KERNEL'
arch/alpha/Kconfig.debug-config MATHEMU
arch/alpha/Kconfig.debug- tristate "Kernel FP software
completion" if DEBUG_KERNEL && !SMP
arch/alpha/Kconfig.debug: default y if !DEBUG_KERNEL || SMP
--
kernel/trace/Kconfig-menuconfig FTRACE
kernel/trace/Kconfig- bool "Tracers"
kernel/trace/Kconfig: default y if DEBUG_KERNEL
What do you see enabled that CONFIG_DEBUG_KERNEL enables that you don't want?
--
Kees Cook
Powered by blists - more mailing lists