linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86/tsc: mark tsc reliable on CoffeeLake

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <b37e870c-033d-61ca-7993-48f9105e2ec6@gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 10 Apr 2019 16:11:53 +0800
From:   You-Sheng Yang <vicamo@...il.com>
To:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        x86@...nel.org, Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...cle.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
        Dou Liyang <douly.fnst@...fujitsu.com>,
        Daniel Vacek <neelx@...hat.com>,
        Mike Travis <mike.travis@....com>,
        Xiaoming Gao <gxm.linux.kernel@...il.com>,
        You-Sheng Yang <vicamo.yang@...onical.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Chuanhua Lei <chuanhua.lei@...ux.intel.com>,
        Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/tsc: mark tsc reliable on CoffeeLake

On 2019/4/8 8:03 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Apr 2019, You-Sheng Yang wrote:
> 
>> From: You-Sheng Yang <vicamo.yang@...onical.com>
>>
>> On Intel CoffeeLake it's observed tsc is always marked unstable
>> unexpectedly after entering idle state Package C10(PC10), and then clock
>> source is switched to hpet. This patch marks tsc as reliable when CPUID
>> matches CoffeeLake.
> 
> This lacks a proper analysis:
> 
>   1) Why is it marked unstable

Usually the differences between wd_nsec and cs_nsec in function
clocksource_watchdog in kernel/time/clocksource.c would be less than a
few thousand nanoseconds. However, when CPU is entering deeper idle
state, PC10, the hpet clocksource readings starts to give inaccurate
values for unknown reason, and the differences to cs_nsec varies from a
few hundred nanoseconds to several hundred millisecond, which is larger
than WATCHDOG_THRESHOLD (62.5ms) and finally results in tsc being marked
unreliable. No HPET overflow is found when this occurs.

>   2) Why is it correct to set that for coffeelake

So far this strange behaviour is only found on coffeelake. Besides this,
no much I can tell actually. This could be probably wrong, but may serve
as a start to bring up some more discussion/investigation to solve the
problem. I would be more than willing to help verifying further
appropriate fixes.

Thank you.

You-Sheng Yang