linux-kernel - Re: [RFC patch 28/41] dma/debug: Simplify stracktrace retrieval

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1904101407190.3479@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date:   Wed, 10 Apr 2019 14:08:19 +0200 (CEST)
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>, x86@...nel.org,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
        iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
        Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC patch 28/41] dma/debug: Simplify stracktrace retrieval

On Wed, 10 Apr 2019, Christoph Hellwig wrote:

> On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 12:28:22PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > Replace the indirection through struct stack_trace with an invocation of
> > the storage array based interface.
> 
> This seems to be missing some context, at least stack_trace_save does
> not actually exist in mainline.
> 
> Please always send the whole series out to everyone on the To and Cc
> list, otherwise patch series are not reviewable.
 
Bah. People complain about overly broad cc-lists and the context is on
lkml. But sure, I just bounced it to you.

Thanks,

	tglx