| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20190410142426.5bf0d9a4.cohuck@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 14:24:26 +0200
From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>
To: Pankaj Gupta <pagupta@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
qemu-devel@...gnu.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, dan.j.williams@...el.com,
zwisler@...nel.org, vishal.l.verma@...el.com, dave.jiang@...el.com,
mst@...hat.com, jasowang@...hat.com, willy@...radead.org,
rjw@...ysocki.net, hch@...radead.org, lenb@...nel.org,
jack@...e.cz, tytso@....edu, adilger.kernel@...ger.ca,
darrick.wong@...cle.com, lcapitulino@...hat.com, kwolf@...hat.com,
imammedo@...hat.com, jmoyer@...hat.com, nilal@...hat.com,
riel@...riel.com, stefanha@...hat.com, aarcange@...hat.com,
david@...hat.com, david@...morbit.com,
xiaoguangrong.eric@...il.com, pbonzini@...hat.com,
kilobyte@...band.pl, yuval.shaia@...cle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/5] virtio-pmem: Add virtio pmem driver
On Wed, 10 Apr 2019 09:38:22 +0530
Pankaj Gupta <pagupta@...hat.com> wrote:
> This patch adds virtio-pmem driver for KVM guest.
>
> Guest reads the persistent memory range information from
> Qemu over VIRTIO and registers it on nvdimm_bus. It also
> creates a nd_region object with the persistent memory
> range information so that existing 'nvdimm/pmem' driver
> can reserve this into system memory map. This way
> 'virtio-pmem' driver uses existing functionality of pmem
> driver to register persistent memory compatible for DAX
> capable filesystems.
>
> This also provides function to perform guest flush over
> VIRTIO from 'pmem' driver when userspace performs flush
> on DAX memory range.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pankaj Gupta <pagupta@...hat.com>
> ---
> drivers/nvdimm/virtio_pmem.c | 88 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/virtio/Kconfig | 10 +++
> drivers/virtio/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/virtio/pmem.c | 124 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/linux/virtio_pmem.h | 60 +++++++++++++++
> include/uapi/linux/virtio_ids.h | 1 +
> include/uapi/linux/virtio_pmem.h | 10 +++
> 7 files changed, 294 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 drivers/nvdimm/virtio_pmem.c
> create mode 100644 drivers/virtio/pmem.c
> create mode 100644 include/linux/virtio_pmem.h
> create mode 100644 include/uapi/linux/virtio_pmem.h
>
(...)
> diff --git a/drivers/virtio/pmem.c b/drivers/virtio/pmem.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..cc9de9589d56
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/virtio/pmem.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,124 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/*
> + * virtio_pmem.c: Virtio pmem Driver
> + *
> + * Discovers persistent memory range information
> + * from host and registers the virtual pmem device
> + * with libnvdimm core.
> + */
> +#include <linux/virtio_pmem.h>
> +#include <../../drivers/nvdimm/nd.h>
> +
> +static struct virtio_device_id id_table[] = {
> + { VIRTIO_ID_PMEM, VIRTIO_DEV_ANY_ID },
> + { 0 },
> +};
> +
> + /* Initialize virt queue */
> +static int init_vq(struct virtio_pmem *vpmem)
IMHO, you don't gain much by splitting off this function...
> +{
> + struct virtqueue *vq;
> +
> + /* single vq */
> + vpmem->req_vq = vq = virtio_find_single_vq(vpmem->vdev,
> + host_ack, "flush_queue");
> + if (IS_ERR(vq))
> + return PTR_ERR(vq);
I'm personally not a fan of chained assignments... I think I'd just
drop the 'vq' variable and operate on vpmem->req_vq directly.
> +
> + spin_lock_init(&vpmem->pmem_lock);
> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&vpmem->req_list);
> +
> + return 0;
> +};
> +
> +static int virtio_pmem_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> +{
> + int err = 0;
> + struct resource res;
> + struct virtio_pmem *vpmem;
> + struct nvdimm_bus *nvdimm_bus;
> + struct nd_region_desc ndr_desc = {};
> + int nid = dev_to_node(&vdev->dev);
> + struct nd_region *nd_region;
> +
> + if (!vdev->config->get) {
> + dev_err(&vdev->dev, "%s failure: config disabled\n",
Maybe s/config disabled/config access disabled/ ? That seems to be the
more common message.
> + __func__);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + vdev->priv = vpmem = devm_kzalloc(&vdev->dev, sizeof(*vpmem),
> + GFP_KERNEL);
Here, the vpmem variable makes sense for convenience, but I'm again not
a fan of the chaining :)
> + if (!vpmem) {
> + err = -ENOMEM;
> + goto out_err;
> + }
> +
> + vpmem->vdev = vdev;
> + err = init_vq(vpmem);
> + if (err)
> + goto out_err;
> +
> + virtio_cread(vpmem->vdev, struct virtio_pmem_config,
> + start, &vpmem->start);
> + virtio_cread(vpmem->vdev, struct virtio_pmem_config,
> + size, &vpmem->size);
> +
> + res.start = vpmem->start;
> + res.end = vpmem->start + vpmem->size-1;
> + vpmem->nd_desc.provider_name = "virtio-pmem";
> + vpmem->nd_desc.module = THIS_MODULE;
> +
> + vpmem->nvdimm_bus = nvdimm_bus = nvdimm_bus_register(&vdev->dev,
> + &vpmem->nd_desc);
And here :)
> + if (!nvdimm_bus)
> + goto out_vq;
> +
> + dev_set_drvdata(&vdev->dev, nvdimm_bus);
> +
> + ndr_desc.res = &res;
> + ndr_desc.numa_node = nid;
> + ndr_desc.flush = virtio_pmem_flush;
> + set_bit(ND_REGION_PAGEMAP, &ndr_desc.flags);
> + set_bit(ND_REGION_ASYNC, &ndr_desc.flags);
> + nd_region = nvdimm_pmem_region_create(nvdimm_bus, &ndr_desc);
> + nd_region->provider_data = dev_to_virtio
> + (nd_region->dev.parent->parent);
Isn't it clear that this parent chain will always end up at &vdev->dev?
Maybe simply set ->provider_data to vdev directly? (Does it need to
grab a reference count of the device, BTW?)
> +
> + if (!nd_region)
> + goto out_nd;
Probably better to do this check before you access nd_region's
members :)
> +
> + return 0;
> +out_nd:
> + err = -ENXIO;
> + nvdimm_bus_unregister(nvdimm_bus);
> +out_vq:
> + vdev->config->del_vqs(vdev);
> +out_err:
> + dev_err(&vdev->dev, "failed to register virtio pmem memory\n");
> + return err;
> +}
> +
> +static void virtio_pmem_remove(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> +{
> + struct virtio_pmem *vpmem = vdev->priv;
> + struct nvdimm_bus *nvdimm_bus = dev_get_drvdata(&vdev->dev);
> +
> + nvdimm_bus_unregister(nvdimm_bus);
I haven't followed this around the nvdimm code, but is the nd_region
you created during probe cleaned up automatically, or would you need to
do something here?
> + vdev->config->del_vqs(vdev);
> + vdev->config->reset(vdev);
> + kfree(vpmem);
You allocated vpmem via devm_kzalloc; isn't it freed automatically on
remove?
> +}
> +
> +static struct virtio_driver virtio_pmem_driver = {
> + .driver.name = KBUILD_MODNAME,
> + .driver.owner = THIS_MODULE,
> + .id_table = id_table,
> + .probe = virtio_pmem_probe,
> + .remove = virtio_pmem_remove,
> +};
> +
> +module_virtio_driver(virtio_pmem_driver);
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(virtio, id_table);
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Virtio pmem driver");
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
Only looked at this from the general virtio driver angle; seems fine
apart from some easy-to-fix issues and some personal style preference
things.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists