linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v14 1/3] /proc/pid/status: Add support for architecture specific output

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CALCETrWV9SVDGQmzvZuub4aOPGyVqx7gPdk6D0s2_7j471jT_g@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 9 Apr 2019 18:58:41 -0700
From:   Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
To:     Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
        Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
        Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
        Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, aubrey.li@...el.com,
        Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v14 1/3] /proc/pid/status: Add support for architecture
 specific output

On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 6:55 PM Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> The architecture specific information of the running processes could
> be useful to the userland. Add support to examine process architecture
> specific information externally.
>
> Signed-off-by: Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@...ux.intel.com>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
> Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>
> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
> Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
> Cc: Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>
> Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
> ---
>  fs/proc/array.c         | 5 +++++
>  include/linux/proc_fs.h | 2 ++
>  2 files changed, 7 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/proc/array.c b/fs/proc/array.c
> index 2edbb657f859..331592a61718 100644
> --- a/fs/proc/array.c
> +++ b/fs/proc/array.c
> @@ -401,6 +401,10 @@ static inline void task_thp_status(struct seq_file *m, struct mm_struct *mm)
>         seq_printf(m, "THP_enabled:\t%d\n", thp_enabled);
>  }
>
> +void __weak arch_proc_pid_status(struct seq_file *m, struct task_struct *task)
> +{
> +}

This pointlessly bloats other architectures.  Do this instead in an
appropriate header:

#ifndef arch_proc_pid_status
static inline void arch_proc_pid_status(...)
{
}
#endif

Or add /proc/PID/x86_status, which sounds better in most respects to me.