[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190410140727.GA17374@bogus>
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 09:07:27 -0500
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] of: Improve of_phandle_iterator_next() error message
On Wed, Apr 03, 2019 at 10:56:33AM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> Understanding why of_phandle_iterator_next() returns an error can
> sometimes be hard to decipher based solely on the error message, a
> typical error example is that #foo-cells = <X> and the phandle property
> used has a smaller number of cells specified, e.g.:
>
> #thermal-sensor-cells = <1>;
> phandle = <&scmi_sensor>
>
> instead of:
>
> phandle <&scmi_sensor 0>;
>
> Instead, make it clear what the expectations are towards debugging
> incorrect Device Tree faster:
>
> OF: /thermal-zones/scmi-thermal: #thermal-sensor-cells = 1, found 0 instead
>
> Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/of/base.c | 5 +++--
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Applied.
Rob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists