[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6defcea8-1e94-14ac-f9c5-e14c61ea4d99@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 19:01:40 +0200
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
To: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Ladislav Michl <ladis@...ux-mips.org>
Cc: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>,
Keerthy <j-keerthy@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clocksource/drivers/timer-ti-dm: Remove
omap_dm_timer_set_load_start
Hi Tony,
can you ask for an acked-by before pulling a patch in your tree?
On 04/04/2019 16:17, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Ladislav Michl <ladis@...ux-mips.org> [190327 08:12]:
>> Hello Nathan,
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 10:01:27PM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
>>> Commit 008258d995a6 ("clocksource/drivers/timer-ti-dm: Make
>>> omap_dm_timer_set_load_start() static") made omap_dm_time_set_load_start
>>> static because its prototype was not defined in a header. Unfortunately,
>>> this causes a build warning on multi_v7_defconfig because this function
>>> is not used anywhere in this translation unit:
>>>
>>> drivers/clocksource/timer-ti-dm.c:589:12: error: unused function
>>> 'omap_dm_timer_set_load_start' [-Werror,-Wunused-function]
>>>
>>> In fact, omap_dm_timer_set_load_start hasn't been used anywhere since
>>> commit f190be7f39a5 ("staging: tidspbridge: remove driver") and the
>>> prototype was removed in commit 592ea6bd1fad ("clocksource: timer-ti-dm:
>>> Make unexported functions static"), which is probably where this should
>>> have happened.
>>
>> Alternatively you might want to look at "clocksource: timer-ti-dm: Add event
>> capture": https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10237217/ (it makes use of
>> function being removed here). It is a part of an attempt to add event capture
>> for OMAP. Of course I would like this functionality to be implemented, but
>> as I do not have a time to continue, I cannot really object removing this
>> function.
>>
>> Just in case you'd be interested in finishing this task ;-)
>
> Well seems like no other takers :) We can always find the missing
> function in git history when needed, so I suggest we apply this.
>
> Adding Keerthy to Cc as he just posted a similar patch.
>
> Regards,
>
> Tony
>
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists