[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CY4PR21MB0279CB155BDC824A2E8A055BBC2E0@CY4PR21MB0279.namprd21.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 18:11:02 +0000
From: Thirupathaiah Annapureddy <thiruan@...rosoft.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>, Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
CC: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@....de>,
Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org" <linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org>,
Microsoft Linux Kernel List <linux-kernel@...rosoft.com>,
"Bryan Kelly (CSI)" <bryankel@...rosoft.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 1/3] ftpm: dt-binding: add dts documentation for fTPM
driver
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
> Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2019 10:57 AM
> To: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
> Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>; Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@....de>;
> Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>; Mark Rutland
> <mark.rutland@....com>; Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>; Arnd Bergmann
> <arnd@...db.de>; Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>; linux-
> kernel@...r.kernel.org; Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>;
> linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org; Microsoft Linux Kernel List <linux-
> kernel@...rosoft.com>; Thirupathaiah Annapureddy <thiruan@...rosoft.com>;
> Bryan Kelly (CSI) <bryankel@...rosoft.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] ftpm: dt-binding: add dts documentation for
> fTPM driver
>
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 01:53:59PM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 02:03:16PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > > On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 12:01:37PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 11:19 AM Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 04:18:29PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> > > > > >On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 1:50 PM Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
> wrote:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> The parameters are similar to the ones used by IBM's vTPM and
> the
> > > > > >> various I2C tpm drivers.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >Bindings describe h/w (or firmware interfaces in this case), not
> drivers.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
> > > > > >> .../bindings/security/tpm/tpm_ftpm_tee.txt | 13
> +++++++++++++
> > > > > >> .../devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt | 1 +
> > > > > >> 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+)
> > > > > >> create mode 100644
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/security/tpm/tpm_ftpm_tee.txt
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> diff --git
> a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/security/tpm/tpm_ftpm_tee.txt
> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/security/tpm/tpm_ftpm_tee.txt
> > > > > >> new file mode 100644
> > > > > >> index 000000000000..20fca67a56c4
> > > > > >> +++
> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/security/tpm/tpm_ftpm_tee.txt
> > > > > >> @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
> > > > > >> +Required properties:
> > > > > >> +- compatible: should be "microsoft,ftpm"
> > > > > >> +- linux,sml-base: 64-bit base address of the reserved memory
> allocated
> > > > > >> + for the firmware event log
> > > > > >> +- linux,sml-size: size of the memory allocated for the firmware
> event log
> > > > > >
> > > > > >Firmware is defining linux specific properties? What if I want to
> run
> > > > > >BSD? We should use 'reg' here instead.
> > > > >
> > > > > This is based on already existing code that defines these names,
> see
> > > > > tpm_read_log_of() in drivers/char/tpm/eventlog/of.c .
> > > >
> > > > BTW, that probably needs updating to handle endianness correctly.
> > >
> > > IIRC this legacy IBM code has broken endianness in the firmware..
> > >
> > > All that stuff in read_log_of, and the related DT stuff, is historical
> > > IBM special case-ness and should not be copied into new things.
> >
> > The fTPM driver does not use it on it's own, so I guess I can just drop
> > this patch then?
>
> If your ARM system boots via EFI then it should pass the firmware
> event log through EFI mechanisms, IIRC.
>
> Otherwise maybe you could make a case for using this, but only if the
> old IBM stuff is perfectly emulated, bugs and all.
>
> Do you even have an event log?
>
Our ARM system is booting using U-boot and Device Tree.
So the ACPI/EFI table mechanism to pass binary boot measurements won't be applicable.
We have event logs working and we are able to successfully read them using
/sys/kernel/security/tpm0/binary_bios_measurements and parse them
--Thiru
> Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists