[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190411221844.GB8692@localhost>
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2019 15:18:45 -0700
From: Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Sinan Kaya <okaya@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
Adrian Reber <adrian@...as.de>,
Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@...hat.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@...hat.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] init: Do not select DEBUG_KERNEL by default
On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 10:00:24AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 10:34 PM Masahiro Yamada
> <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 11:47 AM Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 5:56 PM Sinan Kaya <okaya@...nel.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > We can't seem to have a kernel with CONFIG_EXPERT set but
> > > > CONFIG_DEBUG_KERNEL unset these days.
> > > >
> > > > While some of the features under the CONFIG_EXPERT require
> > > > CONFIG_DEBUG_KERNEL, it doesn't apply for all features.
> > > >
> > > > It looks like CONFIG_KALLSYMS_ALL is the only feature that
> > > > requires CONFIG_DEBUG_KERNEL.
> > > >
> > > > Select CONFIG_EXPERT when CONFIG_DEBUG_KERNEL is chosen but
> > > > you can still choose CONFIG_EXPERT without CONFIG_DEBUG_KERNEL.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@...nel.org>
> > > > Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
> > >
> > > Masahiro, should this go via your tree, or somewhere else?
> >
> >
> > I think somewhere else.
>
> Okay. Andrew, can you take this?
Echoing my comment from the previous thread: this does not seem like the
right solution to me and it introduces a new problem. Please see my
response to v2 for a quick alternative that would address the underlying
bug, which is that some code generation depends on DEBUG_KERNEL.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists