[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8193edcc-fb4b-34d7-fc7b-a37f2bf451a6@xs4all.nl>
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2019 09:24:02 +0200
From: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>
To: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com>,
Nicolas Dufresne <nicolas@...fresne.ca>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...el.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Sean Paul <seanpaul@...omium.org>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@...co.com>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
Paul Kocialkowski <paul.kocialkowski@...tlin.com>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 18/20] lib: image-formats: Add v4l2 formats support
On 4/1/19 4:44 PM, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> Hi Nicolas,
>
> On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 03:55:19PM -0400, Nicolas Dufresne wrote:
>> Le mardi 19 mars 2019 à 22:57 +0100, Maxime Ripard a écrit :
>>> V4L2 uses different fourcc's than DRM, and has a different set of formats.
>>> For now, let's add the v4l2 fourcc's for the already existing formats.
>>
>> Hopefully I get the fixup right this time, see inline.
>
> Thanks a lot for that extensive review.
>
> About the single vs multi-planar issue, I'd be inclined with just
> supporting single-planar formats for now, and extend it later to deal
> with multiplanar formats.
>
> Would that work for everyone?
I'd say that is the right approach.
Regards,
Hans
>
> Maxime
>
> --
> Maxime Ripard, Bootlin
> Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
> https://bootlin.com
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists