[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190411081214.pgdztqdlud5ta466@verge.net.au>
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2019 10:12:14 +0200
From: Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Magnus Damm <damm+renesas@...nsource.se>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@...asonboard.com>,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] iommu/ipmmu-vmsa: Link IOMMUs and devices in sysfs
On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 10:10:28AM +0200, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 03, 2019 at 08:21:43PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > As of commit 7af9a5fdb9e0ca33 ("iommu/ipmmu-vmsa: Use
> > iommu_device_sysfs_add()/remove()"), IOMMU devices show up under
> > /sys/class/iommus/, but their "devices" subdirectories are empty.
>
> Hi Geert,
>
> Should the path be /sys/class/iommu/ (no trailing 's') ?
>
> > Likewise, devices tied to an IOMMU do not have an "iommu" backlink.
> >
> > Make sure all links are created, on both arm32 and arm64.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
> > Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
> > ---
> > v2:
> > - Add Reviewed-by.
> > ---
> > drivers/iommu/ipmmu-vmsa.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++-------
> > 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/ipmmu-vmsa.c b/drivers/iommu/ipmmu-vmsa.c
> > index 9a380c10655e182d..9f2b781e20a0eba6 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iommu/ipmmu-vmsa.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iommu/ipmmu-vmsa.c
> > @@ -885,27 +885,37 @@ static int ipmmu_init_arm_mapping(struct device *dev)
> >
> > static int ipmmu_add_device(struct device *dev)
> > {
> > + struct ipmmu_vmsa_device *mmu = to_ipmmu(dev);
> > struct iommu_group *group;
> > + int ret;
> >
> > /*
> > * Only let through devices that have been verified in xlate()
> > */
> > - if (!to_ipmmu(dev))
> > + if (!mmu)
> > return -ENODEV;
> >
> > - if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM) && !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IOMMU_DMA))
> > - return ipmmu_init_arm_mapping(dev);
> > + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM) && !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IOMMU_DMA)) {
> > + ret = ipmmu_init_arm_mapping(dev);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
> > + } else {
> > + group = iommu_group_get_for_dev(dev);
> > + if (IS_ERR(group))
> > + return PTR_ERR(group);
> >
> > - group = iommu_group_get_for_dev(dev);
> > - if (IS_ERR(group))
> > - return PTR_ERR(group);
> > + iommu_group_put(group);
> > + }
> >
> > - iommu_group_put(group);
> > + iommu_device_link(&mmu->iommu, dev);
Also, is there any value in propagating the return value
of iommu_device_link() ?
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > static void ipmmu_remove_device(struct device *dev)
> > {
> > + struct ipmmu_vmsa_device *mmu = to_ipmmu(dev);
> > +
> > + iommu_device_unlink(&mmu->iommu, dev);
> > arm_iommu_detach_device(dev);
> > iommu_group_remove_device(dev);
> > }
> > --
> > 2.17.1
> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists