[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ab173598-56a8-f9d3-1165-1bd748c2b8d6@arm.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2019 10:47:12 +0100
From: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>
To: yuzenghui@...wei.com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu, julien.thierry@....com,
christoffer.dall@....com, marc.zyngier@....com,
andrew.murray@....com, eric.auger@...hat.com,
zhengxiang9@...wei.com, wanghaibin.wang@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] kvm: arm: Clean up the checking for huge mapping
On 04/11/2019 02:48 AM, Zenghui Yu wrote:
>
> On 2019/4/10 23:23, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
>> If we are checking whether the stage2 can map PAGE_SIZE,
>> we don't have to do the boundary checks as both the host
>> VMA and the guest memslots are page aligned. Bail the case
>> easily.
>>
>> Cc: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@....com>
>> Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
>> Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>
>> ---
>> virt/kvm/arm/mmu.c | 4 ++++
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/mmu.c b/virt/kvm/arm/mmu.c
>> index a39dcfd..6d73322 100644
>> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/mmu.c
>> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/mmu.c
>> @@ -1624,6 +1624,10 @@ static bool
>> fault_supports_stage2_huge_mapping(struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot,
>> hva_t uaddr_start, uaddr_end;
>> size_t size;
>> + /* The memslot and the VMA are guaranteed to be aligned to
>> PAGE_SIZE */
>> + if (map_size == PAGE_SIZE)
>> + return true;
>> +
>> size = memslot->npages * PAGE_SIZE;
>> gpa_start = memslot->base_gfn << PAGE_SHIFT;
>>
> We can do a comment clean up as well in this patch.
>
> s/<< PAGE_SIZE/<< PAGE_SHIFT/
Sure, I missed that. Will fix it in the next version.
Cheers
Suzuki
Powered by blists - more mailing lists