[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <dac3e90a-dd9f-56eb-faa2-c48d1fe380da@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2019 15:00:51 +0200
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
To: Andrey Smirnov <andrew.smirnov@...il.com>
Cc: linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, Chris Healy <cphealy@...il.com>,
Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@...il.com>,
Angus Ainslie <angus@...ea.ca>,
dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 09/13] thermal: qoriq: Convert driver to use regmap API
On 05/04/2019 20:24, Andrey Smirnov wrote:
[ ... ]
>>> +static const struct regmap_range qiriq_yes_ranges[] = {
>>> + regmap_reg_range(REGS_TMR, REGS_TSCFGR),
>>> + regmap_reg_range(REGS_TTRnCR(0), REGS_TTRnCR(3)),
>>> + /* Read only registers below */
>>> + regmap_reg_range(REGS_TRITSR(0), REGS_TRITSR(15)),
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +static const struct regmap_access_table qiriq_wr_table = {
>>> + .yes_ranges = qiriq_yes_ranges,
>>> + .n_yes_ranges = ARRAY_SIZE(qiriq_yes_ranges) - 1,
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +static const struct regmap_access_table qiriq_rd_table = {
>>> + .yes_ranges = qiriq_yes_ranges,
>>> + .n_yes_ranges = ARRAY_SIZE(qiriq_yes_ranges),
>>> +};
>>
>> As the table are the same, it would make sense to fold both structure to
>> a single one (and s/qiriq/qoriq/ ?)
>>
>
> Writable registers are a subset of readable registers and n_yes_ranges
> is different between the two. Not sure how I could fold the two into a
> single struct.
Right, never mind my comment.
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists