linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86/pci: Clean up usage of X86_DEV_DMA

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 11 Apr 2019 08:35:43 -0500
From:   Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
        x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Keith Busch <keith.busch@...el.com>,
        Jonathan Derrick <jonathan.derrick@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86/pci: Clean up usage of X86_DEV_DMA_OPS

On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 07:18:49AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 04:45:01PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > [+cc Keith, Jonathan (VMD guys)]
> > 
> > I'm OK with this from a PCI perspective.  It would be nice if
> > 
> >   dma_domain_list
> >   dma_domain_list_lock
> >   add_dma_domain()
> >   del_dma_domain()
> >   set_dma_domain_ops()
> > 
> > could all be moved to vmd.c, since they're really only used there.
> 
> I have another patch to eventually kill that, but it will need a little
> more prep work and thus be delayed to the next merge window.

Awesome, thanks!  I really appreciate all the global cleanup work you do.

Bjorn