[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bc4cd9b2-327d-199b-6de4-61561b45c661@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2019 07:31:00 -0700
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To: Yang Shi <yang.shi@...ux.alibaba.com>, mhocko@...e.com,
mgorman@...hsingularity.net, riel@...riel.com, hannes@...xchg.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, keith.busch@...el.com,
dan.j.williams@...el.com, fengguang.wu@...el.com, fan.du@...el.com,
ying.huang@...el.com, ziy@...dia.com
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [v2 PATCH 5/9] mm: vmscan: demote anon DRAM pages to PMEM node
On 4/10/19 8:56 PM, Yang Shi wrote:
> include/linux/gfp.h | 12 ++++
> include/linux/migrate.h | 1 +
> include/trace/events/migrate.h | 3 +-
> mm/debug.c | 1 +
> mm/internal.h | 13 +++++
> mm/migrate.c | 15 ++++-
> mm/vmscan.c | 127 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> 7 files changed, 149 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
Yikes, that's a lot of code.
And it only handles anonymous pages?
Also, I don't see anything in the code tying this to strictly demote
from DRAM to PMEM. Is that the end effect, or is it really implemented
that way and I missed it?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists